|
District Circular Letters
May 10, 2001
BANKING SUPERVISION AND REGULATION:
PROTECTING CONSUMER INFORMATION FROM IDENTITY THEFT
To State Member Banks, Bank
Holding Companies, U.S. Branches
and Agencies of Foreign Banks,
and Others Concerned,
in the Twelfth Federal Reserve District
Identity Theft and Pretext Calling (SR
01-11[SUP])
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act directs the Board and other federal agencies
to ensure that financial institutions have policies, procedures, and controls
in place to prevent the unauthorized disclosure of customer financial
information and to deter and detect fraudulent access to such information.
Consistent with section 525 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15 U.S.C. 6825),
this SR letter addresses how state member banks and other banking organizations
that provide products or services to the public or that maintain customer
account information should protect customer information against identity
theft. Included in this letter is an explanation on completing a Suspicious
Activity Report (SAR) when reporting offenses associated with identity
theft and pretext calling. In addition, banking organizations are reminded
that a guidance was recently issued by the Board and the other banking
agencies concerning the safeguards that institutions can put into place
to ensure the security of customer information (Please see our circular
letter dated March 6, 2001).
Background
The fraudulent use of an individual's personal identifying information,
such as social security number, date of birth, or bank account number,
to commit a financial crime like credit card, check, loan or mortgage
fraud (commonly referred to as "identity theft") is a growing problem.
One way that wrongdoers improperly obtain personal information of bank
customers in order to commit identity theft is by contacting a bank, posing
as a customer or someone authorized to have the customer's information,
and convincing an employee of the bank to release customer identifying
information. This practice is known as "pretext calling."
There are several federal criminal statutes that address illegal conduct
associated with identity theft and pretext calling. These include the
following:
-
Section 1028 of the Federal Criminal Code (18 U.S.C. 1028) makes
it a crime to knowingly use, without lawful authority, a means of
identification (such as an individual's social security number or
date of birth) of another person with the intent to commit a crime.
-
Section 523 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15 U.S.C. 6828) makes
it a crime to obtain customer information of a financial institution
by means of false or fraudulent statements to an officer, employee,
agent, or customer of a financial institution.
-
Section 523 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act also makes it a crime to
request another person to obtain customer information at a financial
institution, if the requester knows that the information will be obtained
by making a false or fraudulent statement. This would mean that a
banking organization requesting customer information that is then
obtained by pretext calling could be subject to criminal sanctions
if the institution knows how the information would be obtained.
Protecting Customer Information
Banking organizations can take various steps to safeguard customer information
and to reduce the risk of loss from identity theft. These include the
following:
(1.) Establishing procedures to verify the identity of individuals
applying for financial products
(2.) Establishing procedures to prevent fraudulent activities related
to customer information
(3.) Maintaining a customer information security program.
1. Verification Procedures: Verification procedures for new accounts
should include steps to ensure the accuracy and veracity of the application
information. These could involve using independent sources to confirm
information submitted by a customer; calling a customer to confirm that
the customer has opened a credit card or checking account; or verifying
information through an employer identified on an application form. A financial
institution can also independently verify that the zip code and telephone
area code provided on an application are from the same geographical area.
2. Fraud Prevention: To prevent fraudulent address changes, banking
organization should verify customer information before executing an address
change and send a confirmation of the address change to both the new address
and the address on record. If an organization receives a request for a
new credit card or new checks in conjunction with a change of address
notification, it should verify the request with the customer.
When opening a new account, a banking organization should check to ensure
that information provided on an application has not previously been associated
with fraudulent activity. For example, if a banking organization uses
a consumer report to process a new account application and the report
is issued with a fraud alert, the banking organization's system for credit
approval should flag the application and ensure that the individual is
contacted before it is processed. In addition, fraud alerts should be
shared across the organization's lines of business.
3. Information Security: In early 2001, the Board and the other
federal banking agencies issued an Interagency Guidelines Establishing
Standards for Safeguarding Customer Information. These guidelines
are attached to the January 17, 2001 interagency press release and can
be obtained on the Federal Reserve’s website at http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/press/boardacts/2001/20010117/.
The guidelines require banking organizations to establish and implement
a comprehensive information security program that includes appropriate
administrative, technical, and physical safeguards for customer information.
To prevent pretext callers from using pieces of personal information to
impersonate account holders in order to gain access to their account information,
the guidelines require banks and other financial institutions to establish
written policies and procedures to control the access to customer information.
Other measures that may reduce the incidence of pretext calling include
limiting the circumstances under which customer information may be disclosed
by telephone. For example, a banking organization may not permit employees
to release information over the telephone unless the requesting individual
provides a proper authorization code (other than a commonly used identifier).
Banking organizations can also use caller identification technology or
a request for a call back number as tools to verify the authenticity of
a request.
Banking organizations should train employees to recognize and report
possible indicators of attempted pretext calling. They should also implement
testing to determine the effectiveness of controls designed to thwart
pretext callers, and may consider using independent staff or third parties
to conduct unscheduled pretext phone calls to various departments.
Reporting Suspected Identity Theft and Pretext Calling: SARs
Current regulations require state member banks and other banking organizations
supervised by the Federal Reserve to report all known or suspected criminal
violations to law enforcement and the Board on SARs. Criminal activity
related to identity theft or pretext calling has historically manifested
itself as credit or debit card fraud, loan or mortgage fraud, or false
statements to the institution, among other activities.
As a means of better identifying and tracking known or suspected criminal
violations related to identity theft and pretext calling, a banking organization
should, in addition to reporting the underlying fraud (such as credit
card or loan fraud) on a SAR, also indicate within the SAR that such a
known or suspected violation is the result of identity theft or pretext
calling. Therefore, when identity theft or pretext calling is believed
to be the underlying cause of the known or suspected criminal activity,
the reporting institution should, consistent with the existing SAR instructions,
complete a SAR in the following manner:
-
In Part III, Box 35, of the SAR, check all appropriate boxes that
indicate the type of known or suspected violation being reported and,
in addition, in the "Other" category, write in "identity theft" or
"pretext calling," as appropriate.
-
In Part V of the SAR, in the space provided for the narrative explanation
of what is being reported, include the grounds for suspecting identity
theft or pretext calling in addition to the other violation being
reported.
-
In the event that the only known or suspected criminal violation
detected is the identity theft or pretext calling, then write "identity
theft" or "pretext calling," as appropriate, in the "Other" category
in Part III, Box 35, and provide a description of the activity in
Part V of the SAR.
Consumer Education and Assistance
Banking organizations should provide their customers with information
about how to prevent identity theft and necessary steps to take in the
event a customer becomes a victim of identity theft. An excellent source
of information for consumers is the Federal Trade Commission's website
at http://www.consumer.gov/idtheft/.
Banking organizations should also assist their customers who are victims
of identity theft and fraud by having trained personnel to respond to
customer inquiries, by determining whether an account should be closed
immediately after a report of unauthorized use, and by prompt issuance
of new checks or new credit, debit or ATM cards. If a customer has multiple
accounts with the institution, it should assess whether any other account
has been the subject of potential fraud.
Copies
Copies of Docket
R-1073 (PDF - 53KB) are available from our Corporate Services
Department. To request copies to be sent by mail, please call (415)
974-2060.
All circulars and documents are available on the Internet through the
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco's Internet site, at http://www.frbsf.org/banking/letters/.
Additional Information
For additional information about protecting consumers from identity theft,
please contact our Banking Supervision and Regulation Department, at (415)
974-2995.
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO
|