District Circular Letters
March 6, 2001
BANKING SUPERVISION AND REGULATION:
COMMENT PERIOD EXTENDED ON REAL
ESTATE ACTIVITIES PROPOSAL,
FINAL RULE ON ALTERNATIVE TO RATED
DEBT REQUIREMENT, REVISED CAPITAL PROPOSAL
FOR NONFINANCIAL EQUITY INVESTMENTS, AND
GUIDELINES FOR CUSTOMER INFORMATION SECURITY
To State Member Banks, Bank
Holding Companies, U.S. Branches
and Agencies of Foreign Banks,
and Others Concerned,
in the Twelfth Federal Reserve District
Federal Reserve and Treasury
Extend Comment Period on Real Estate Activities Proposal (R-1091)
PDF-92KB
Please refer to our letter dated
January 18, 2001, which describes a request for comment on whether real
estate brokerage and real estate management are activities that are financial
in nature or incidental to a financial activity and therefore permissible
for financial holding companies and financial subsidiaries of national
banks.
The comment period has been extended
to May 1, 2001.
Federal Reserve and Treasury
Announce Final Rule on Alternative to Rated Debt Requirement for Financial
Subsidiaries (R-1066)
PDF-22KB
The Federal Reserve Board and
the Secretary of the Treasury has approved a final rule establishing the
alternative criteria that certain large banks may satisfy in order to
control a financial subsidiary under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.
Under the act, a national or state
member bank ranked among the largest 50 insured banks may control a financial
subsidiary only if the bank meets certain criteria, including having an
issue of highly rated debt outstanding. The next 50 largest insured banks
may control a financial subsidiary if they satisfy this debt rating requirement
or if they satisfy an alternative comparable requirement jointly established
by the Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board. Under the final rule, a
bank meets the alternative requirement if it has a current long-term issuer
credit rating from a nationally recognized statistical rating organization
that is within the three highest investment-grade categories used by the
rating organization.
The final rule was effective March
2, 2001.
Agencies Release Revised Capital
Proposal for Nonfinancial Equity Investments (R-1097)
The Federal Reserve Board and
the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has proposed new rules governing
the regulatory capital treatment for equity investments in nonfinancial
companies held by banks, bank holding companies, and financial holding
companies.
The new proposed capital treatment,
revised in response to public comment and in consultation with the Treasury
Department and other federal banking agencies, represents a significant
modification of a proposal made by the Federal Reserve Board in March
2000 (Please see our letter dated March 29, 2000).
The new proposal would apply to
banks and their holding companies and would apply to equity investments
made under the new merchant banking authority granted by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley
Act and to equity investments in nonfinancial companies made under other
specifically legal authorities.
The new proposal would generally
impose a capital charge that would increase in steps as the banking organization's
level of concentration in equity investments increased. An eight percent
Tier 1 capital deduction would apply on covered investments that in the
aggregate represent up to 15 percent of an organization's Tier 1 capital.
A top marginal charge of 25 percent would be set for covered investments
that aggregate more than 25 percent of the organization's Tier 1 capital.
Equity investments through small
business investment companies would be exempt from these new capital deduction
requirements and would continue to be subject to the same capital requirements
that presently apply, unless the value of those investments exceeds 15
percent of the bank's Tier 1 capital. Grandfathered investments under
section 24(f) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act would also be exempt
under the new proposal.
Under the proposal, the agencies
would also heighten their monitoring of banking organizations as the level
of concentration in equity investment increases.
Comments are requested by April
16, 2001.
Agencies Adopt Guidelines for
Customer Information Security (R-1073)
PDF-10KB
The federal bank and thrift regulatory
agencies have adopted joint guidelines for safeguarding confidential
customer information. The guidelines implement section 501(b) of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley
Act (GLBA), and will be effective on July 1, 2001.
The GLBA requires the agencies
to establish standards for financial institutions relating to administrative,
technical, and physical safeguards for customer records and information.
These safeguards are to perform the following functions:
- Ensure the security and confidentiality of
customer records and information
- Protect against any anticipated threats or
hazards to the security or integrity of these records
- Protect against unauthorized access to or use
of these records or information that would result in substantial harm
or inconvenience to a customer
The guidelines require financial
institutions to establish an information security program to:
- Identify and assess the risks that may threaten
customer information,
- Develop a written plan containing policies
and procedures to manage and control these risks
- Implement and test the plan,
- Adjust the plan on a continuing basis to account
for changes in technology, the sensitivity of customer information,
and internal or external threats to information security.
Each institution may implement
a security program that is appropriate to its size and complexity and
the nature and scope of its operations.
The guidelines outline specific
security measures that institutions should consider in implementing a
security program. A financial institution must adopt those security measures
determined to be appropriate.
The guidelines also outline responsibilities
of directors of financial institutions in overseeing the protection of
customer information. The board of directors should oversee an institution's
efforts to develop, implement, and maintain an effective information security
program and approve written information security policies and programs.
The guidelines require financial
institutions to oversee their service provider arrangements in order to
protect the security of customer information maintained or processed by
service providers. Each institution must exercise due diligence in selecting
its service providers, and require its service providers by contract to
implement security measures that safeguard customer information. When
indicated by an institution's risk assessment, the institution must also
monitor its service providers by reviewing audits, summaries of test results,
or other equivalent evaluation of its service providers to confirm that
they have satisfied their contractual obligations.
Copies
Copies of the notices summarized
in this letter (Dockets R-1066, R-1097, R-1073) are available from
our Corporate Services Department. To request copies to be sent by mail,
please call (415) 974-2060.
All circulars and documents are
available on the Internet through the Board of Governors' web site at
http://www.federalreserve.gov.
Additional Information
For additional information, please
call the following Banking Supervision and Regulation Department numbers:
Docket R-1091 (415) 974-3007
Docket R-1066 (415)
974-2926
Docket R-1073 (415)
974-2995
Docket R-1097
(415) 974-3177
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO
|