Glenn Rudebusch

Executive Vice President and Director of Research

Monetary economics, Macroeconomics, Finance

Glenn.Rudebusch (at) sf.frb.org

CV

Glenn Rudebusch, Economist in the Department of Research at Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

Show less Current Unpublished Working Papers

Can Spanned Term Structure Factors Drive Stochastic Yield Volatility?
2014-03 | With Christensen and Lopez | January 2014

+ abstract
The ability of the usual factors from empirical arbitrage-free representations of the term structure — that is, spanned factors — to account for interest rate volatility dynamics has been much debated. We examine this issue with a comprehensive set of new arbitrage-free term structure specifications that allow for spanned stochastic volatility to be linked to one or more of the yield curve factors. Using U.S. Treasury yields, we find that much realized stochastic volatility cannot be associated with spanned term structure factors. However, a simulation study reveals that the usual realized volatility metric is misleading when yields contain plausible measurement noise. We argue that other metrics should be used to validate stochastic volatility models

Modeling Yields at the Zero Lower Bound: Are Shadow Rates the Solution?
2013-39 | With Christensen | December 2013

+ abstract
Recent U.S. Treasury yields have been constrained to some extent by the zero lower bound (ZLB) on nominal interest rates. In modeling these yields, we compare the performance of a standard affine Gaussian dynamic term structure model (DTSM), which ignores the ZLB, and a shadow-rate DTSM, which respects the ZLB. We find that the standard affine model is likely to exhibit declines in fit and forecast performance with very low interest rates. In contrast, the shadow-rate model mitigates ZLB problems significantly and we document superior performance for this model class in the most recent period.

A Probability-Based Stress Test of Federal Reserve Assets and Income
2013-38 | With Christensen and Lopez | December 2013

+ abstract
To support the economy, the Federal Reserve amassed a large portfolio of long-term bonds. We assess the Fed’s associated interest rate risk — including potential losses to its Treasury securities holdings and declines in remittances to the Treasury. Unlike past examinations of this interest rate risk, we attach probabilities to alternative interest rate scenarios. These probabilities are obtained from a dynamic term structure model that respects the zero lower bound on yields. The resulting probability-based stress test finds that the Fed’s losses are unlikely to be large and remittances are unlikely to exhibit more than a brief cessation.

Monetary Policy Expectations at the Zero Lower Bound
2013-18 | With Bauer | February 2014

+ abstract
To obtain monetary policy expectations from the yield curve near the zero lower bound (ZLB), it is crucial to account for the distributional asymmetry of future short rates. Because conventional dynamic term structure models (DTSMs) ignore it, they severely violated the ZLB in recent years and performed significantly worse than alternative models that account for it. Shadow-rate models incorporate the ZLB, and therefore achieve superior fit and forecasting performance. In addition, they provide estimates of the modal short-rate path, which can serve to construct accurate and plausible forecasts of the time of future short-rate liftoff.

Estimating Shadow-Rate Term Structure Models with Near-Zero Yields
2013-07 | With Christensen | June 2013

+ abstract
Standard Gaussian affine dynamic term structure models do not rule out negative nominal interest rates—a conspicuous defect with yields near zero in many countries. Alternative shadow-rate models, which respect the nonlinearity at the zero lower bound, have been rarely used because of the extreme computational burden of their estimation. However, by valuing the call option on negative shadow yields, we provide the first estimates of a three-factor shadow-rate model. We validate our option-based results by closely matching them using a simulation-based approach. We also show that the shadow short rate is sensitive to model fit and specification.

Pricing Deflation Risk with U.S. Treasury Yields
2012-07 | With Christensen and Lopez | May 2012

+ abstract
We use an arbitrage-free term structure model with spanned stochastic volatility to determine the value of the deflation protection option embedded in Treasury inflation-protected securities (TIPS). The model accurately prices the deflation protection option prior to the financial crisis when its value was near zero; at the peak of the crisis in late 2008 when deflationary concerns spiked sharply; and in the post-crisis period. During 2009, the average value of this option at the five-year maturity was 41 basis points on a par-yield basis.

Show less Published Articles (Refereed Journals and Volumes)

The Signaling Channel for Federal Reserve Bond Purchases
Forthcoming in International Journal of Central Banking | With Bauer

Term Premia and Inflation Uncertainty: Empirical Evidence from an International Panel Dataset: Comment
American Economic Review 104(1), January 2014, 323-337 | With Bauer and Wu

+ abstract
Term premia implied by maximum likelihood estimates of affine term structure models are misleading because of small-sample bias. We show that accounting for this bias alters the conclusions about the trend, cycle, and macroeconomic determinants of the term premia estimated in Wright (2011). His term premium estimates are essentially acyclical, and often just parallel the secular trend in long-term interest rates. In contrast, bias-corrected term premia show pronounced countercyclical behavior, consistent with theoretical and empirical arguments about movements in risk premia.

Do Central Bank Liquidity Facilities Affect Interbank Lending Rates?
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 32(1), January 2014, 136-151 | With Christensen and Lopez

+ abstract
In response to the global financial crisis that started in August 2007, central banks provided extraordinary amounts of liquidity to the financial system. To investigate the effect of central bank liquidity facilities on term interbank lending rates, we estimate a six-factor arbitrage-free model of U.S. Treasury yields, financial corporate bond yields, and term interbank rates. This model can account for fluctuations in the term structure of credit risk and liquidity risk. A significant shift in model estimates after the announcement of the liquidity facilities suggests that these central bank actions did help lower the liquidity premium in term interbank rates.

Extracting Deflation Probability Forecasts from Treasury Yields
International Journal of Central Banking 8(4), December 2012, 21-60 | With Christensen and Lopez

+ abstract
We construct probability forecasts for episodes of price deflation (i.e., a falling price level) using yields on nominal and real U.S. Treasury bonds. The deflation probability forecasts identify two “deflation scares” during the past decade: a mild one following the 2001 recession and a more serious one starting in late 2008 with the deepening of the financial crisis. The estimated deflation probabilities are generally consistent with those from macroeconomic models and surveys of professional forecasters, but they also provide high-frequency insight into the views of financial market participants. The probabilities can also be used to price the deflation protection option embedded in real Treasury bonds.

The Response of Interest Rates to U.S. and U.K. Quantitative Easing
Economic Journal 122(564), November 2012, F385-F414 | With Christensen

+ abstract
We analyze declines in government bond yields following announcements by the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England of plans to buy longer term debt. Using dynamic term structure models, we decompose US and UK yields into expectations about future short-term interest rates and term premiums. We find that declines in US yields mainly reflected lower expectations of future short-term interest rates, while declines in UK yields appeared to reflect reduced term premiums. Thus, the relative importance of the signalling and portfolio balance channels of quantitative easing may depend on market institutional structures and central bank communication policies.

Correcting Estimation Bias in Dynamic Term Structure Models
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 30(3), July 2012, 454-467 | With Bauer and Wu

+ abstract
The affine dynamic term structure model (DTSM) is the canonical empirical finance representation of the yield curve. However, the possibility that DTSM estimates may be distorted by small-sample bias has been largely ignored. We show that conventional estimates of DTSM coefficients are indeed severely biased, and this bias results in misleading estimates of expected future short-term interest rates and of long-maturity term premia. We provide a variety of bias-corrected estimates of affine DTSMs, both for maximally-flexible and over-identified specifications. Our estimates imply short rate expectations and term premia that are more plausible from a macro-finance perspective.

The Bond Premium in a DSGE Model with Long-Run Real and Nominal Risks
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 4, January 2012, 105-143 | With Swanson

+ abstract
The term premium on nominal long-term bonds in the standard dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model used in macroeconomics is far too small and stable relative to empirical measures obtained from the data–an example of the “bond premium puzzle.” However, in models of endowment economies, researchers have been able to generate reasonable term premiums by assuming that investors have recursive Epstein-Zin preferences and face long-run economic risks. We show that introducing Epstein-Zin preferences into a canonical DSGE model can also produce a large and variable term premium without compromising the model’s ability to fi…t key macroeconomic variables. Long-run real and nominal risks further improve the model’s ability to …fit the data with a lower level of household risk aversion.

The Affine Arbitrage-Free Class of Nelson-Siegel Term Structure Models
Journal of Econometrics 164, September 2011, 4-20 | With Christensen and Diebold

+ abstract
We derive the class of affine arbitrage-free dynamic term structure models that approximate the widely-used Nelson-Siegel yield curve specification. These arbitrage-free Nelson-Siegel (AFNS) models can be expressed as slightly restricted versions of the canonical representation of the three-factor affine arbitrage-free model. Imposing the Nelson-Siegel structure on the canonical model greatly facilitates estimation and can improve predictive performance. In the future, AFNS models appear likely to be a useful workhorse representation for term structure research.

Inflation Expectations and Risk Premiums in an Arbitrage-Free Model of Nominal and Real Bond Yields
Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 42, September 2010, 143-178 | With Christensen and Lopez

+ abstract
Differences between yields on comparable-maturity U.S. Treasury nominal and real debt, the so-called breakeven inflation (BEI) rates, are widely used indicators of inflation expectations. However, better measures of inflation expectations could be obtained by subtracting inflation risk premiums from the BEI rates. We provide such decompositions using an estimated affine arbitrage-free model of the term structure that captures the pricing of both nominal and real Treasury securities. Our empirical results suggest that long-term inflation expectations have been well anchored over the past few years, and inflation risk premiums, although volatile, have been close to zero on average.

Macro-Finance Models of Interest Rates and the Economy
The Manchester School 78, September 2010, 25-52

+ abstract
During the past decade, much new research has combined elements of finance, monetary economics and macroeconomics in order to study the relationship between the term structure of interest rates and the economy. In this survey, I describe three different strands of such interdisciplinary macro-finance term structure research. The first adds macroeconomic variables and structure to a canonical arbitrage-free finance representation of the yield curve. The second examines bond pricing and bond risk premiums in a canonical macroeconomic dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model. The third develops a new class of arbitrage-free term structure models that are empirically tractable and well suited to macro-finance investigations.

An Arbitrage-Free Generalized Nelson-Siegel Term Structure Model
Econometrics Journal 12(3), November 2009, 33-64 | With Christensen and Diebold

+ abstract
The Svensson generalization of the popular Nelson-Siegel term structure model is widely used by practitioners and central banks. Unfortunately, like the original Nelson-Siegel specification, this generalization, in its dynamic form, does not enforce arbitrage-free consistency over time. Indeed, we show that the factor loadings of the Svensson generalization cannot be obtained in a standard finance arbitrage-free affine term structure representation. Therefore, we introduce a closely related generalized Nelson-Siegel model on which the no-arbitrage condition can be imposed. We estimate this new arbitrage-free generalized Nelson-Siegel model and demonstrate its tractability and good in-sample fit.

Forecasting Recessions: The Puzzle of the Enduring Power of the Yield Curve
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 27(4), 2009, 492-503 | With Williams

+ abstract
We show that professional forecasters have essentially no ability to predict future recessions a few quarters ahead. This is particularly puzzling because, for at least the past two decades, researchers have provided much evidence that the yield curve, specifically the spread between long- and short-term interest rates, does contain useful information at that forecast horizon for predicting aggregate economic activity and, especially, for signalling future recessions. We document this puzzle and suggest that forecasters have generally placed too little weight on yield curve information when projecting declines in the aggregate economy.

Examining the Bond Premium Puzzle with a DSGE Model
Journal of Monetary Economics 55, October 2008, S111-S126 | With Swanson

+ abstract
The basic inability of standard theoretical models to generate a sufficiently large and variable nominal bond risk premium has been termed the “bond premium puzzle.” We show that the term premium on long-term bonds in the canonical dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model used in macroeconomics is far too small and stable relative to the data. We find that introducing long-memory habits in consumption as well as labor market frictions can help fit the term premium, but only by seriously distorting the DSGE model’s ability to fit other macroeconomic variables, such as the real wage; therefore, the bond premium puzzle remains.

A Macro-Finance Model of the Term Structure, Monetary Policy, and the Economy
Economic Journal 118, July 2008, 906-926 | With Wu

+ abstract
This article develops and estimates a macro-finance model that combines a canonical affine no-arbitrage finance specification of the term structure of interest rates with standard macroeconomic aggregate relationships for output and inflation. Based on this combination of yield curve and macroeconomic structure and data, we obtain several interesting results: (1) the latent term structure factors from no-arbitrage finance models appear to have important macroeconomic and monetary policy underpinnings, (2) there is no evidence of a slow partial adjustment of the policy interest rate by the central bank, and (3) both forward-looking and backward-looking elements play roles in macroeconomic dynamics.

Revealing the Secrets of the Temple: The Value of Publishing Central Bank Interest Rate Projections
In Asset Prices and Monetary Policy, ed. by J.Y. Campbell | Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008. 247-284 | With Williams | Posted with the permission of the University Chicago Press.

+ abstract
The modern view of monetary policy stresses its role in shaping the entire yield curve of interest rates in order to achieve various macroeconomic objectives. A crucial element of this process involves guiding financial market expectations of future central bank actions. Recently, a few central banks have started to explicitly signal their future policy intentions to the public, and two of these banks have even begun publishing their internal interest rate projections. We examine the macroeconomic effects of direct revelation of a central bank’s expectations about the future path of the policy rate. We show that, in an economy where private agents have imperfect information about the determination of monetary policy, central bank communication of interest rate projections can help shape financial market expectations and may improve macroeconomic performance.

Macroeconomic Implications of Changes in the Term Premium
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 89(4), July 2007, 241-269 | With Sack and Swanson

+ abstract
Linearized New Keynesian models and empirical no-arbitrage macro-finance models offer little insight regarding the implications of changes in bond term premiums for economic activity. This paper investigates these implications using both a structural model and a reduced-form framework. The authors show that there is no structural relationship running from the term premium to economic activity, but a reduced-form empirical analysis does suggest that a decline in the term premium has typically been associated with stimulus to real economic activity, which contradicts earlier results in the literature.

Accounting for a Shift in Term Structure Behavior with No-Arbitrage and Macro-Finance Models
Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 39 (2-3), March 2007, 395-422 | With Wu

+ abstract
This paper examines a shift in the dynamics of the term structure of interest rates in the U.S. during the mid-1980s. We document this shift using standard interest rate regressions and using dynamic, affine, no-arbitrage models estimated for the pre- and post-shift subsamples. The term structure shift largely appears to be the result of changes in the pricing of risk associated with a “level” factor. Using a macro-finance model, we suggest a link between this shift in term structure behavior and changes in the dynamics and risk pricing of the Federal Reserve’s inflation target as perceived by investors.

The Bond Yield “Conundrum” from a Macro-Finance Perspective
Monetary and Economic Studies 24(S-1), December 2006, 83-128 | With Swanson and Wu

+ abstract
In 2004 and 2005, long-term interest rates remained remarkably low despite improving economic conditions and rising short-term interest rates, a situation that then-Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan dubbed a “conundrum.” We document the extent and timing of this conundrum using two empirical no-arbitrage macro-finance models of the term structure of interest rates. These models confirm that the recent behavior of long-term yields has been unusual–that is, it cannot be explained within the framework of the models. Therefore, we consider other macroeconomic factors omitted from the models and find that some of these variables, particularly declines in long-term bond volatility, may explain a portion of the conundrum. Foreign official purchases of U.S. Treasuries appear to have played little or no role.

Monetary Policy Inertia: Fact or Fiction?
International Journal of Central Banking 2 (4), December 2006, 85-135

+ abstract
Many interpret estimated monetary policy rules as suggesting that central banks conduct very sluggish partial adjustment of short-term policy interest rates. In contrast, others argue that this appearance of policy inertia is an illusion and simply reflects the spurious omission of important persistent influences on the actual setting of policy. Similarly, the real-world implications of the theoretical arguments for policy inertia are debatable. However, empirical evidence on policy gradualism obtained by examining expectations of future monetary policy embedded in the term structure of interest rates is definitive and indicates that the actual amount of policy inertia is quite low.

The Macroeconomy and the Yield Curve: A Dynamic Latent Factor Approach
Journal of Econometrics 131(1-2), March 2006, 309-338 | With Diebold and Aruoba

+ abstract
We estimate a model that summarizes the yield curve using latent factors (specifically, level, slope, and curvature) and also includes observable macroeconomic variables (specifically, real activity, inflation, and the monetary policy instrument). Our goal is to provide a characterization of the dynamic interactions between the macroeconomy and the yield curve. We find strong evidence of the effects of macro variables on future movements in the yield curve and evidence for a reverse influence as well. We also relate our results to the expectations hypothesis.

Using a Long-Term Interest Rate as the Monetary Policy Instrument
Journal of Monetary Economics 52(5), July 2005, 855-879 | With Williams and McGough

+ abstract
Using a short-term interest rate as the monetary policy instrument can be problematic near its zero-bound constraint. An alternative strategy is to use a long-term interest rate as the policy instrument. We find when Taylor-type policy rules are used to set the long rate in a standard New Keynesian model, indeterminacy–that is, multiple rational expectations equilibria–may often result. However, a policy rule with a long rate policy instrument that responds in a “forward-looking” fashion to inflation expectations can avoid the problem of indeterminacy.

Modeling Bond Yields in Finance and Macroeconomics
American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 95(2), May 2005, 415-420 | With Diebold and Piazzesi | Posted with the permission of the American Economic Association

+ abstract
From a macroeconomic perspective, the short-term interest rate is a policy instrument under the direct control of the central bank. From a finance perspective, long rates are risk-adjusted averages of expected future short rates. Thus, as illustrated by much recent research, a joint macro-finance modeling strategy will provide the most comprehensive understanding of the term structure of interest rates. We discuss various questions that arise in this research, and we also present a new examination of the relationship between two prominent dynamic, latent factor models in this literature: the Nelson-Siegel and affine no-arbitrage term structure models.

Assessing the Lucas Critique in Monetary Policy Models
Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 37(2), April 2005, 245-272

+ abstract
Empirical estimates of monetary policy rules suggest that the behavior of U.S. monetary policymakers changed during the past few decades. However, for that same time period, statistical analyses of lagged representations of the economy, such as VARs, often have not rejected the null of structural stability. These two sets of empirical results appear to contradict the Lucas critique. This paper reconciles these results with the Lucas critique by showing that the apparent policy invariance of reduced forms is consistent with the magnitude of historical policy shifts and the relative insensitivity of the reduced forms of plausible forward-looking macroeconomic specifications to policy shifts.

Estimating the Euler Equation for Output
Journal of Monetary Economics 51(6), September 2004, 1133-1153 | With Fuhrer

+ abstract
New Keynesian macroeconomic models have generally emphasized that expectations of future output are a key factor in determining current output. The theoretical motivation for such forward-looking behavior relies on a straightforward generalization of the well-known Euler equation for consumption. In this paper, we use maximum likelihood and generalized method of moments (GMM) methods to explore the empirical importance of output expectations. We find little evidence that rational expectations of future output help determine current output, especially after taking into account the small-sample bias in GMM.

Term Structure Evidence on Interest Rate Smoothing and Monetary Policy Inertia
Journal of Monetary Economics 49(6), September 2002, 1161-1187

+ abstract
Numerous studies have used quarterly data to estimate monetary policy rules or reaction functions that appear to exhibit a very slow partial adjustment of the policy interest rate. The conventional wisdom asserts that this gradual adjustment reflects a policy inertia or interest rate smoothing behavior by central banks. However, such quarterly monetary policy inertia would imply a large amount of forecastable variation in interest rates at horizons of more than three months, which is contradicted by evidence from the term structure of interest rates. The illusion of monetary policy inertia evident in the estimated policy rules likely reflects the persistent shocks that central banks face.

Assessing Nominal Income Rules for Monetary Policy with Model and Data Uncertainty
The Economic Journal 112, 2002, 402-432 | Posted with the permission of the Royal Economic Society

+ abstract
Nominal income rules for monetary policy have long been debated, but two issues are of particular recent interest. First, there are questions about the performance of such rules over a range of plausible empirical models–especially models with and without explicit rational inflation expectations. Second, there are questions about the performance of these rules in real time using the type of data that is actually available contemporaneously to policymakers rather than final revised data. This paper determines optimal monetary policy rules in the presence of such model uncertainty and real-time data uncertainty and finds only a limited role for nominal output growth.

Eurosystem Monetary Targeting: Lessons from U.S. Data
European Economic Review 46, March 2002, 417-442 | With Svensson

+ abstract
Using a small empirical model of inflation, output, and money estimated on U.S. data, we compare the relative performance of monetary targeting and inflation targeting. The results show monetary targeting to be quite inefficient, yielding both higher inflation and output variability. This is true, even with a nonstochastic money demand formulation. Our results are also robust to using a P* model of inflation. Therefore, in these popular frameworks, there is no support for the prominent role given to money growth in the Eurosystem’s monetary policy strategy.

Is the Fed Too Timid? Monetary Policy in an Uncertain World
Review of Economics and Statistics 83(2), May 2001, 203-217

+ abstract
Estimates of the Taylor rule using historical data from the past decade or two suggest that monetary policy in the U.S. can be characterized as having reacted in a moderate fashion to output and inflation gaps. In contrast, the parameters of optimal Taylor rules derived using empirical models of the economy often recommend much more vigorous policy responses. This paper attempts to match the historical policy rule with an optimal policy rule by incorporating uncertainty into the derivation of the optimal rule and by examining plausible variations in the policymaker’s model and preferences.

Opportunistic and Deliberate Disinflation under Imperfect Credibility
Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 32, November 2000, 707-721 | With Bomfim

Policy Rules for Inflation Targeting
In Monetary Policy Rules, ed. by Taylor | Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999. 203-246 | With Svensson

Do Measures of Monetary Policy in a VAR Make Sense? A Reply to Christopher A Sims
International Economic Review 39, November 1998, 943-948

Do Measures of Monetary Policy in a VAR Make Sense?
International Economic Review 39, November 1998, 907-931

Judging Instrument Relevance in Instrument Variables Estimation
International Economic Review 37, May 1996, 283-298 | With Hall and Wilcox

Monetary Policy and Credit Conditions: Evidence from the Composition of External Finance: Comment
American Economic Review 86, March 1996, 300-309 | With Oliner | Posted with the permission of the American Economic Association

Measuring Business Cycles: A Modern Perspective
Review of Economics and Statistics 78, February 1996, 67-77 | With Diebold

The Lucas Critique Revisited: Assessing the Stability of Empirical Euler Equations for Investment
Journal of Econometrics 70, January 1996, 291-316 | With Oliner and Sichel

New and Old Models of Business Investment: A Comparison of Forecasting Performance
Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 27, August 1995, 806-826 | With Oliner and Sichel

Federal Reserve Interest Rate Targeting, Rational Expectations, and the Term Structure
Journal of Monetary Economics 24, April 1995, 245-274

The Uncertain Unit Root in Real GNP
American Economic Review 83, March 1993, 264-272 | Posted with the permission of the American Economic Association

Further Evidence on Business-Cycle Duration Dependence
In Business Cycles, Indicators, and Forecasting, ed. by Watson and Stock | Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the NBER, 1993. 255-280 | With Diebold and Sichel

Sources of the Financing Hierarchy for Business Investment
Review of Economics and Statistics 74, November 1992, 643-654 | With Oliner

Have Postwar Economic Fluctuations Been Stabilized?
American Economic Review 82, September 1992, 993-1005 | With Diebold | Posted with permission of the American Economic Association

Trends and Random Walks in Macroeconomic Time Series: A Re-examination
International Economic Review 33, August 1992, 661-680

Forecasting Output with the Composite Leading Index: A Real-Time Analysis
Journal of the American Statistical Association 86, September 1991, 603-610 | With Diebold

Is Consumption Too Smooth? Long Memory and the Deaton Paradox
Review of Economics and Statistics 73, February 1991, 1-9 | With Diebold

On the Power of Dickey-Fuller Tests Against Fractional Alternatives
Economics Letters 35, 1991, 155-160 | With Diebold

Turning Point Prediction with the Composite Leading Index: An Ex Ante Analysis
In Leading Economic Indicators: New Approaches and Forecasting Records, ed. by Lahiri and Moore | Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. 231-256 | With Diebold

A Nonparametric Investigation of Duration Dependence in the American Business Cycle
Journal of Political Economy 98, June 1990, 596-616 | With Diebold

Long Memory and Persistence in Aggregate Output
Journal of Monetary Economics 24, September 1989, 189-209 | With Diebold

An Empirical Disequilibrium Model of Labor, Consumption, and Investment in the United States
International Economic Review 30, August 1989, 633-654

Scoring the Leading Indicators
Journal of Business 62, July 1989, 369-391 | With Diebold

Are Productivity Fluctuations Due to Real Supply Shocks?
Economics Letters 27, 1988, 327-331

Testing for Labor Market Equilibrium with an Exact Excess Demand Disequilibrium Model
Review of Economics and Statistics 68, August 1986, 468-476

Show less Books

Yield Curve Modeling and Forecasting: The Dynamic Nelson-Siegel Approach
2013 | Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press | Diebold Rudebusch

Business Cycles: Durations, Dynamics, and Forecasting
1999 | Princeton: Princeton University Press | Rudebusch Diebold

The Estimation of Macroeconomic Disequilibrium Models with Regime Classification Information
1987 | New York: Springer-Verlag | Rudebusch

Show less FRBSF Publications

Stress Testing the Fed
Economic Letter 2014-08 | March 24, 2014 | With Christensen and Lopez

Expectations for Monetary Policy Liftoff
Economic Letter 2013-34 | November 18, 2013 | With Bauer

What Caused the Decline in Long-term Yields?
Economic Letter 2013-19 | July 8, 2013 | With Bauer

Signals from Unconventional Monetary Policy
Economic Letter 2011-36 | November 21, 2011 | With Bauer

The Fed’s Interest Rate Risk
Economic Letter 2011-11 | April 11, 2011

The Fed’s Exit Strategy for Monetary Policy
Economic Letter 2010-18 | June 14, 2010

Inflation: Mind the Gap
Economic Letter 2010-02 | January 19, 2010 | With Liu

Disagreement about the Inflation Outlook
Economic Letter 2009-31 | October 5, 2009 | With Leduc and Weidner

The Fed’s Monetary Policy Response to the Current Crisis
Economic Letter 2009-17 | May 22, 2009

Publishing Central Bank Interest Rate Forecasts
Economic Letter 2008-02 | January 25, 2008

Publishing FOMC Economic Forecasts
Economic Letter 2008-01 | January 18, 2008

Monetary Policy Inertia and Recent Fed Actions
Economic Letter 2007-03 | January 26, 2007

Monetary Policy and Asset Price Bubbles
Economic Letter 2005-18 | August 5, 2005

Finance and Macroeconomics
Economic Letter 2003-12 | May 2, 2003 | With Dennis

Macroeconomic Models for Monetary Policy
Economic Letter 2002-11 | April 19, 2002 | With Wu

Has a Recession Already Started?
Economic Letter 2001-29 | October 19, 2001

Asset Prices, Exchange Rates, and Monetary Policy
Economic Letter 2001-18 | June 15, 2001

How Sluggish Is the Fed?
Economic Letter 2001-05 | March 2, 2001

Five Questions about Business Cycles
Economic Review | 2001 | With Diebold

Structural Change and Monetary Policy
Economic Letter 2000-13 | April 28, 2000

How Fast Can the New Economy Grow?
Economic Letter 2000-05 | February 25, 2000

» View FRBSF Publications prior to 2000

Show less Other Works

Discussion of “Complexity and Monetary Policy”
International Journal of Central Banking 9(1), January 2013, 219-228

Discussion of “Cracking the Conundrum” by Backus and Wright
Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2007(1), August 2007, 317-329 | Posted with the permission of the Brookings Institution Press

Monetary Policy and the Term Structure of Interest Rates: An Overview of Some Recent Research
In Monetary Policy and the Term Structure of Interest Rates, ed. by Rovelli and Angeloni | New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998. 263-271

A Comment on ‘Rational Expectations and the Economic Consequences of Changes in Regime’
In Macroeconometrics: Developments, Tensions, and Prospects, ed. by Hoover | Boston: Kluwer Academic Press, 1995. 345-349

Shorter Recessions and Longer Expansions
FRB Philadelphia Business Review, November 1991, 13-20 | With Diebold

Stochastic Properties of Revisions in the Index of Leading Indicators
In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Business and Economic Statistics Section | Washington, DC: American Statistical Association, 1987. 712-717 | With Diebold