Ask
Dr. Econ
June 2000
Are we on the verge of a turning point
in the credit cycle? If so, is deterioration in credit quality likely
to impact the economy in similar ways as it did in the past, or will different
sectors and industries be affected by future credit cycle deterioration?
Credit Cycles
If only Dr. Econ had the definitive answer on the arrival of the next
credit cycle! Credit cycles may affect all types of financial market participants,
from borrowers to lenders, from financial institutions to households and
the corporate sector. Since the Federal Reserve is a primary banking industry
regulator, I'll answer your question with an eye toward movements in asset
quality in the banking industry.
Banking regulators have expressed concerns about potential deterioration
in credit standards and lending terms over the past couple of
years, despite strong economic growth during that period. Regulators and
bankers are well aware that historically, most problem loans--loans that
are past due or on nonaccrual status (no longer accruing interest)--were
made during good economic times. Given the robust economy in 2000, asset
quality through 2000-Q2 at large banks remains strong by historic standards
for total loans, real estate loans, and commercial and industrial loans.
Changes in asset quality are an important indicator of banking industry
performance that often result in changes in banks' lending standards.
The availability of credit over the business cycle also is affected by
changing lending terms and standards; looser lending standards tend to
increase the supply of credit, while tighter lending standards tend to
reduce the supply of credit. You may track movements in banks' lending
standards by reviewing the quarterly results of the Federal Reserve's
Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey on Bank Lending Practices: http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/SnLoanSurvey/
Asset quality changes that take place over the credit cycle at banks
are typically measured by problem loan ratios--the percentage of loans
of a particular type that are either past due or nonaccrual. Those ratios
tend to move 'inversely' with the movements in the overall economy, both
at the national and state level. This relationship can be seen in the
chart, which plots quarterly U.S. job growth rates and quarterly bank
problem loan ratios from the late 1980s until 2000-Q2. Thus, one key to
examining the health of a bank's loan portfolio is likely to be the overall
condition of the economy in the bank's market area (national,
state, or local). Another key to a bank's risk exposure may be its
portfolio composition, i.e., whether its loan portfolio is highly
concentrated in potentially higher-risk loans, for example, construction
and development lending or subprime consumer loans.

The experience of small banks in California in the early 1990s illustrates
how the economy and portfolio exposure worked together during that period
to reduce asset quality. Zimmerman (1996) noted several key factors in
an FRBSF Economic Letter on credit cycle problems in California:
http://www.frbsf.org/econrsrch/wklyltr/wl9604.html#impact
The sub-par performance of many community banks in California is
a continuation of the difficulties many small banks have struggled
with since the 1990-1991 recession. Two of the most important factors
for their performance have been the severity of regional economic
conditions in the state and their earlier decisions to move away from
a more diversified loan portfolio and into more commercial real estate
financing.
Looking forward, it is important to continue to evaluate economic conditions
and banking portfolio risks, as well as examine other potential emerging
risk areas. Those risks might include susceptibility to downturns in the
bank's market area or key industries and potential risks arising from
portfolio concentrations, especially in high-risk lending or other financial
activities.
References:
Schlesinger, Jacob M. "Greenspan Says Lenders May Be Growing
Lax." Wall Street Journal, Thursday, March 9, 2000.
Zimmerman, Gary C. 1996. "California's Community Banks in the 1990s."
FRBSF Economic Letter, Number 1996-04, (January 26). (http://www.frbsf.org/econrsrch/wklyltr/wl9604.html#impact)
Zimmerman, Gary C. 1996. "Factors Influencing Community Bank Performance
in California." Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San
Francisco, 1996 Number 1. (http://www.frbsf.org/econrsrch/econrev/96-1/26-42.pdf)
The following web-site provides the most recent summary of banking industry
performance for the nation: FDIC's Quarterly Banking Profile. (http://www2.fdic.gov/qbp/)
|