Ask
Dr. Econ
October 2005
What are the differences between debt and equity markets?
First, some definitions
The debt market is the market where debt instruments are traded. Debt
instruments are assets that require a fixed payment to the holder, usually
with interest. Examples of debt instruments include bonds (government
or corporate) and mortgages.
The equity market (often referred to as the stock market) is the market
for trading equity instruments. Stocks are securities that are a claim
on the earnings and assets of a corporation (Mishkin 1998). An example
of an equity instrument would be common stock shares, such as those traded
on the New York Stock Exchange.
How are debt instruments different from equity instruments?
There are important differences between stocks and bonds. Let me highlight
several of them:
- Equity financing allows a company to acquire funds (often for
investment) without incurring debt. On the other hand, issuing a bond
does increase
the debt burden of the bond issuer because contractual interest payments
must be paid— unlike dividends, they cannot be reduced or suspended.
- Those who purchase equity instruments (stocks) gain ownership
of the business whose shares they hold (in other words, they gain the
right
to vote on the issues important to the firm). In addition, equity
holders have claims on the future earnings of the firm.
In contrast,
bondholders do not gain ownership in the business or have any claims
to the future profits of the borrower. The borrower’s
only obligation is to repay the loan with interest.
- Bonds are considered to be less risky investments for at least
two reasons. First, bond market returns are less volatile than stock
market
returns. Second, should the company run into trouble, bondholders
are paid first, before other expenses are paid. Shareholders are less
likely
to receive any compensation in this scenario.
How large are these markets?
It seems that the average person is much more aware of the equity (stock)
market than of the debt market. Yet, the debt market is the much larger
of the two. For example, in September 2005 (the most recent data available
at the time this answer was written), about $218 billion of new corporate
bonds were issued, as compared to slightly under $18 billion in new corporate
stocks. Chart 1 compares new issues of corporate bonds and corporate
stocks in the United States for the past ten years.

Another way to compare the size of the two markets is to think about
total amounts of debt and equity instruments outstanding at the end
of a particular period. According to “Flow of Funds” data
of March 2006, published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System for the fourth quarter of 2005, there was approximately $34,818
billion in outstanding debt instruments and about $18,199 billion in
outstanding corporate equities. Thus, the size of the debt market as
of the last quarter of 2005 was about twice that of the equity market.
Why are these markets important?
Both markets are of central importance to economic activity. The bond
market is vital for economic activity because it is the market where
interest rates are determined. Interest rates are important on a personal
level, because they guide our decisions to save and to finance major
purchases (such as houses, cars, and appliances, to give a few examples).
From a macroeconomic standpoint, interest rates have an impact on consumer
spending and on business investment.
Chart 2 below shows interest rates on select bonds with different risk
properties for the last 10 years. The chart compares interest rates on
corporate AAA bonds (highest quality bonds) and Baa bonds (medium-quality
bonds) and long-term Treasury bonds (considered to be risk-free interest
rate).

The stock market is equally important for economic activity because
it affects both investment spending and consumer spending decisions.
The price of shares determines the amount of funds that a firm can raise
by selling newly issued stock. That, in turn, will determine the amount
of capital goods this firm can acquire and, ultimately, the volume of
the firm’s production.
Another aspect to consider is the fact that many U.S. households hold
their wealth in financial assets (see Table 1 below). According the data
from “Survey
of Consumer Finances” published by the Federal Reserve
System, in 2004, 1.8% of U.S. households held bonds (down from 3% in
2001), and 20.7% of U.S. households held
stocks (down from 21.3% in 2001). Table 1 shows financial asset ownership
data for 2004. In addition to this direct ownership of stocks and bonds,
it’s important to remember that there are households who hold these
instruments indirectly—in retirement accounts, for instance (more
than half of U.S. households held retirement accounts in 2001). Poor
performance of equity and debt markets reduces wealth of households who
hold stocks and bonds. This, in turn, reduces their spending (via the
wealth effect), slowing down the economy.
For a further discussion of financial markets and their importance,
please see Ask
Dr. Econ, January 2005.

View larger image of Table 1
(as
of April 2006)
Bucks,
Brian, Kennickell, Arthur and Kevin B. Moore. 2006. “Recent
Changes in U.S. Family Finances: Evidence from the 2001 and 2004 Survey
of
Consumer Finances.”
“Flow of Funds Accounts of the United States.” March 9,
2006. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Mishkin, Frederic and Stanley Eakins. 2000. “Financial Markets
and Institutions.” Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishers.
“The Federal Reserve System: Purposes and Functions.” 2005.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Mishkin, Frederic. 1998. “The Economics of Money, Banking,
and Financial Markets,” 5th ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
Publishers.
|