
Does
cash still count? Electronic payments in their many forms
are a ubiquitous part of our culture and the U.S. economy.
Many of us have our paychecks automatically deposited in
our bank accounts. We use online bill payment services
and frequently shop at our favorite virtual storefronts.
Businesses increasingly use electronic payment methods—taking
advantage of cost and efficiency gains to contribute to
their bottom lines. With this commonplace use of electronic
money, you might assume that paper payments are shrinking,
and perhaps the predictions of a cashless society, which
have persisted since the 1960s, will come true. While it
is clear check usage is declining, at this point, it certainly
isn’t clear for the other form of paper payments—cash.
Because cash transactions
are anonymous, that is, they aren’t
tracked through the banking system, measuring how often
cash payments are made is difficult. However, the total amount
of money in circulation can be measured precisely to determine
whether
currency is growing or shrinking.
And growing it is! Over the past three decades, the value
of U.S. currency in circulation
has grown dramatically—from $93.4 billion in 1977 to
$783.2 billion in 20061. The number of pieces of currency
in circulation also has increased during this time—from
7.5 billion to 26.4 billion.
Cash certainly counts to
the Federal Reserve. The twelve Federal Reserve Banks play
a major role in the distribution
of U.S. currency. In fact, currency is a liability
of the Reserve Banks and, as such, is a significant component
of Reserve Bank balance sheets. Reserve Banks supply
commercial
banks, savings banks, and credit unions (collectively
known as "depository institutions”)
with the currency they in turn provide to their customers.
Reserve
Banks also accept
deposits of unneeded and/or worn currency from depository
institutions and remove unfit and counterfeit notes
from circulation.
This is a big business for
the Reserve Banks. From Sunday night until Friday evening,
Reserve Bank
cash offices keep the money flowing—receiving,
counting, and processing currency from and paying
out currency to depository
institutions. Federal Reserve Bank offices provide
cash services directly to over half of the banks,
savings banks, and credit
unions in the United States and indirectly to the
remainder that contract with correspondent banks
using Reserve
Bank cash services. Altogether in 2006, the Reserve
Banks received and processed 38 billion notes,
destroyed 7
billion worn notes, and paid out 39 billion new
and fit notes at
an operating cost of $319 million, not counting
the $600 million incurred by the Bureau of Engraving
and Printing
to print new notes.
Like any large business,
the opportunities and challenges associated with providing
cost-effective,
high-quality
cash services are significant, particularly in
today’s rapidly
changing business environment. As the headquarters for the
national Cash Product Office for the Reserve Banks’ cash
business line, the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
plays a leading role setting the strategic agenda and collaborating
with all of the Reserve Banks to address these challenges
and leverage opportunities.
The
value of U.S. currency in circulation has
increased steadily
through the decades

Source: U.S. Treasury
Cradle to Grave: The Life of U.S. Currency
The life of a new Federal Reserve note begins when the
Reserve Banks work with the Board of Governors to determine
the
demand for new currency and submit their annual print
order to the U.S. Treasury’s Bureau of Engraving
and Printing (BEP). The order is an estimate of the amount
of currency
the public will demand in the upcoming year and reflects
estimated changes in currency usage and destruction rates
of unfit currency. The Reserve Banks pay for the cost
of printing and transporting new currency from the BEP
printing
facilities in Washington, D.C., and Fort Worth, Texas.
Over the last decade, these printing facilities combined
turned out a little more than 99 billion new notes.
Printing the notes involves a series
of passes using three separate printing processes. An offset
press is used to
print the subtle background colors on the front and back
of the
notes—red and tan for the $10 note, peach and green
for the $20 note, and blue and red for the $50 note. The
intaglio press follows to create U.S. currency’s artful
design and distinct look and feel of engraved images, icons,
and scroll work. Once dry, notes that meet an examiner’s
inspection standards are ready for the final process using
typographic printing to create the Federal Reserve District
seal and its corresponding number and the Treasury seal
and serial numbers.
Newly printed notes are cut, bundled,
and shipped to Reserve Banks for distribution. Upon arrival,
they are officially “Federal
Reserve notes,” although the notes do not become a
liability on Reserve Banks’ balance sheets until
they are distributed to depository institutions for circulation.
Notes typically do not stay in circulation for long.
In fact,
usually they make several return visits to Reserve Banks
before they are ultimately destroyed. When depository
institutions receive more currency from their customers
than they need
on hand, often they want to convert this
non-interest-earning asset into balances in their Federal
Reserve accounts. Reserve balances can be invested in
interest-earning instruments such as a fed funds loan
to another institution
or a U.S. Treasury security. Reserve Banks use these
currency deposits to fill orders from other depository
institutions
for additional currency to meet their customers’ demand.
In this way, Reserve Banks act as an intermediary between
depository institutions to balance currency needs within
a region and across the country.
Each time Reserve Banks receive currency from a depository
institution, they run the currency through high-speed
processing machines that count the notes, identify
possible counterfeits,
and determine if notes are suitable for recirculation.
Worn notes that are unfit for recirculation are automatically
shredded, giving new meaning to President Harry Truman’s
famous statement, “The buck stops here.”
The National Cash Product Office
In coordinating the Federal Reserve’s vast cash services
business, the Cash Product Office is involved in every aspect
of the life cycle of a Federal Reserve note. Staff from the
San Francisco Reserve Bank’s Los Angeles, San Francisco,
and Seattle offices direct the activities of the Product
Office. Additionally, staff in the Richmond and Cleveland
Reserve Banks perform substantial automation work. In keeping
with the Product Office’s strong commitment to collaborative
leadership and reliance on the deep business knowledge that
resides throughout the Federal Reserve System, all major
Product Office initiatives involve key staff from other Reserve
Banks.

Cash Product Office
Staff: San Francisco
Cash Product Office
staff in San Francisco (left to right) Nancy
Leon, Carla Kitchin, Mark Peralta, Stephen
Lai, Barbara
Bennett, Louise Willard, Roxana Tsougarakis, Chad Harper,
Jaclyn Hodges, and Jeff Collins provide strategic direction
to the Federal Reserve’s national cash services business.
In this capacity, they and their counterparts in
Los Angeles guide policy and product development,
capacity planning, and inventory management for
the Reserve Banks.
Not pictured: Kevin
Fleming, Leslie Goff, Sy-Dang Tran
The Cash Product Office’s four major responsibilities
are very similar to those involved in managing any product.
Staff conduct strategic planning and market research around
the central bank’s currency distribution role. They
develop programs and procedures for the operational aspects
of the Fed’s cash business, and they provide the technology
support and development for the automated cash infrastructure.
Finally, as the Federal Reserve’s primary point
of contact on cash distribution matters, they communicate
with external constituencies such as large depository
institutions,
vendors, the press, and other central banks. All four of these responsibilities
tie directly to the Federal Reserve’s fundamental
goals that were laid out when the Federal Reserve Act of
1913 authorized the
issuance of
Federal Reserve notes. These goals include ensuring that
cash is readily available when and where it is needed,
especially during times of crisis, and that the public
is confident
that currency supplied by banks and merchants is genuine
and readily usable in subsequent transactions. Underlying
everything is the commitment to good stewardship, namely,
that the resources spent to print, process, store, and
distribute cash to the domestic and international public
are minimized for society as a whole.

Cash
Product Office: Los Angeles
Left to Right: Rosalinda
Bernardino, Mochael Valente, Shawna Gale, Marla Borowski,
Phillip B. Johnson, Olympia
LaPoint, Juan Rodriquez, Phuong Luu
Evolving Markets and Models
| Underlying everything
is the commitment to good stewardship, namely,
that the resources spent to print, process, store,
and distribute cash to the domestic and international
public are minimized for society as a whole. |
While the Fed’s fundamental goals regarding U.S. currency
remain the same, clearly, much has changed since the 1920s
when the Federal Reserve’s cash
services footprint first was established. The country’s
major population and commerce centers have expanded from
the Northeast and the Midwest to include the South and the
West. Within the past ten years, legislative changes and
new technologies have enabled the Fed’s largest
depository institution customers to offer nationwide
banking services,
while using more centralized business models. Additionally,
with changing patterns in the use of cash and innovative
technologies, large depository institutions are using
increasingly sophisticated models to manage their own
cash inventories
and provide cash to their customers across the country. The changes within the Federal
Reserve have been dramatic as well. Historically each Reserve
Bank and Branch provided
a full range of services to local depository institutions.
Now, a number of services,
particularly check services, have evolved into centralized
functions, which are intended to improve efficiency and
market alignment. In cash services, new buildings have
been built
and new, high-speed processing equipment has been introduced
since the 1920s. The Phoenix Cash Processing facility built
in the San Francisco Reserve’s District in 2001 is
the most recently constructed site.

Central Business Administration Function
Within the CPO, Central
Business Administration Function (CBAF) staff such as
(left to right) Amy
Burr, Ken Green, Carolyn Pitts, Sam Koeritz, Kathy
Sigman, David Huang, and
William Riley provide the technology and development support
for the Federal Reserve’s cash operations. The CBAF
team develops and supports the complex suite of systems
that tracks, inventories, and accounts for Federal Reserve
notes
during their life cycles, among other responsibilities.
The team is based in the San Francisco, Richmond, and Cleveland
Reserve Banks.
In 2006, the Cash Product Office
spearheaded several major initiatives to align the Federal
Reserve’s cash
services with the evolving market. The initiatives
that follow are
setting the stage for better use of
resources, improved productivity, and more effective
working relationships with customers and other business
partners. Aligning the Cash Footprint: Infrastructure
The year 2006 marked the culmination of a multiyear review
of the Federal Reserve’s cash processing and distribution
points, resulting in a new, supplemental distribution model,
called a “cash depot,” to address changing
market realities. Several factors provided the impetus
for this review including the growing cost, complexity,
and economies of scale of currency processing equipment
and the increased overhead expenses associated with higher
post-9/11 security costs.
Staff from the San Francisco, Kansas
City, Atlanta, Richmond, New York, Minneapolis, and Dallas
Reserve Banks conducted
the review. The review concluded that new cash delivery
models (in addition to the traditional collocation of currency
processing
and distribution at each Federal Reserve site) were not
only feasible but also consistent with good stewardship of
the
public’s resources. Specifically, Reserve Bank Branch
markets that lack the volume to support large-scale currency
processing operations could be converted to the depot service
model as long as the depot is no more than five hours driving
distance from the closest Reserve Bank Branch where processing
takes place.
With a cash depot, depository institutions still deposit
currency and pick up orders in their local Branch city,
but do so at a secure collection point operated by a
third party
transportation company acting as the agent for the Federal
Reserve. The third party, generally an armored carrier,
transports deposits to the servicing Reserve Bank office
which counts
deposits and prepares orders. The third party then transports
orders from the servicing Reserve Branch back to the
secure collection point for payout to the depository institution.
The Federal Reserve pays for the transportation between
the depot and the servicing Reserve Bank.
This distribution model eliminated costly overhead and
achieved economies of scale without shifting the burden
for long-distance
transportation costs to depository institutions. Since
the initiative was launched, six Reserve Branches have
converted
to the depot model: Little Rock, served by Memphis;
Louisville, served by Cincinnati; Buffalo, served by Cleveland;
Portland,
served by Seattle; Oklahoma City, served by Dallas;
and Birmingham, served by Atlanta. The Omaha Branch is slated
to convert
to the depot model once Kansas City, its servicing
site,
completes its new building in the first half of 2008.
With the country’s changing
demographics, the review team also analyzed whether any
new markets warranted a Federal
Reserve cash presence, either in the form of a depot
or a full-fledged facility. Given the well-established
private
sector transportation solutions coupled with uncertainty
over future domestic cash volume trends, the team
concluded that expansions were not advisable at this time.

Currency
Technology Office
Currency
Technology Office (CTO) staff members (left
to right) Diana
Joyner and Elva Wilhite oversee the installation of one of
the upgraded high-speed cash processing machines in the San
Francisco Reserve Bank’s vault. As one of the technical
arms of the Cash Product Office, the CTO, which is based
at the Richmond Reserve Bank, focuses on the automation of
physical currency handling, the high-speed processing environment,
and financial and administrative support for System-level
currency processing. The group also provides agency support
to the Bureau of Engraving and Printing and the Secret Service.
Increasing Productivity:
High-Speed Cash Processing
The Federal Reserve owns 133 high-speed cash processing
machines that count notes and detect worn and counterfeit
currency.
Each machine can process about 700,000 pieces of currency
per nine-hour shift, and many of the machines run two shifts
per day. In 2006, the Reserve Banks processed approximately
38 billion pieces of currency on these machines! Like any
good business, the Fed continually assesses how it can
improve productivity and reduce processing costs. For the
past two
years, engineers at the Richmond Reserve Bank worked with
the machine’s manufacturer to
increase the currency processing throughput. The first
refurbished machine is slated for production in 2007, with
the remainder
set for production by 2009. Early indicators suggest the
upgraded machines will increase the throughput rate by
8 to 10 percent or more. Getting the Incentives Right:
Currency Recirculation
Historically, the Federal Reserve has provided its currency
processing service to depository institutions at no charge.
To prevent overuse of this free service, the Federal Reserve
has a long-standing administrative policy that discourages
depository institutions from depositing and ordering fit
currency of the same denomination within a period of five
business days. This practice of churning currency, whereby
institutions deposit and order fit currency within the same
business week rather than holding it, is known as “cross-shipping” within
the Federal Reserve. The process is inefficient because it
requires unnecessary handling, processing, and round-trip
transportation. In 2006, processing cross-shipped currency
cost the Reserve Banks approximately $27 million.
| It isn’t surprising
that the cross-shipping policy was ineffective, and
as a result, the Federal Reserve,
and by extension the public, incurred unnecessary currency
processing and storage costs. |
Despite the administrative policy,
depository institutions have strong incentives to cross-ship.
They receive fit,
clean currency for payout to customers without having to
sort it
themselves. More importantly, excess cash sent to the
Federal Reserve is credited to their reserve account balances
that
can be invested, unlike non-interest-earning cash kept
on hand in bank vaults. Given these reasons, it isn’t
surprising that the cross-shipping policy was ineffective,
and as a result, the Federal Reserve, and by extension
the public, incurred unnecessary currency processing and
storage
costs.
After consultation with the Reserve
Banks, the Board of Governors, and the banking industry,
the Cash Product
Office proposed
a more market oriented set of incentives. The revised
policy, which was approved by the Board of Governors and
published
in early 2006, has two key components. First, institutions
will be allowed to cross-ship currency but will be required
to pay a fee that essentially equals the Federal Reserve’s
cost to process and store cross-shipped currency. This approach
accounts for the true societal cost of processing cross-shipped
currency, while preserving this service as an option if it’s
the most efficient solution for the depository institution.
With payments to and receipts
from depository institutions rising,
Reserve Banks are
processing more cash

Source: Federal Reserve Cash Product Office
The second component, a Custodial Inventory program,
allows qualifying depository institutions to convert
a portion
of the cash balances held in their vaults into reserve
account
balances that earn interest. Through this program,
qualifying institutions can recoup the interest they would
have
lost from holding cash receipts for a few days rather
than sending
the cash to their local Reserve Bank. To qualify for
the Custodial Inventory program, depository institutions
undergo
a safety and soundness review, a site inspection and
consistency review, and procedural training, among
other requirements.
Together, the fee and Custodial
Inventory programs are referred to as the “Recirculation Policy.” The
Custodial Inventory program was implemented in July 2006,
and at year-end
had nearly 30 active depository institutions. The fee will
take effect in July 2007, giving depository institutions
a year to adjust their operations. Additionally, to assist
institutions in their planning, the Cash Product Office has
sent pro forma billing statements since mid-2004.
Improving Investment Decisions:
Cash Payments Study
The infrastructure and resources required to run the Federal
Reserve’s cash business are highly capital intensive—requiring
the investment of hundreds of millions of dollars in processing
equipment, software and hardware, and vault facilities. Projecting
the future growth of the cash business is critical to managing
investment decisions. Yet, projecting this growth is complicated
by several factors. First, it is difficult to estimate the
precise amount of U.S. currency that circulates domestically,
the measure which drives the Federal Reserve’s cash
processing service. Second, changes in the processing methods
depository institutions use, along with their inventory
management behaviors, can have a major impact on Federal
Reserve processing
volumes. Finally, the adoption
of alternative payment options by consumers and businesses
undoubtedly will affect currency growth, but data on cash
payment usage trends and displacement of cash by other
payment options is very limited and sketchy.
Within this context, the Cash Product
Office, with the assistance of staff from the Board of
Governors and the
Boston, Cleveland,
and Richmond Reserve Banks, is conducting a market research
study to understand the acceptance of cash by businesses.
Understanding cash substitution, the cash cycle, and
cash holding policies and behaviors from a business-centric
perspective will help shed light on the future demand
for
Federal Reserve
cash services—in terms of the number of cash payments
in general and the volume of cash held by or flowing
through businesses.
| Understanding cash
substitution, the cash cycle, and cash holding policies
and behaviors from a business-centric
perspective will help shed light on the future demand
for Federal Reserve cash services
. . . . |
The cash payments study involves qualitative interviews
with 30 to 50 large businesses with substantial cash
receipts and a quantitative survey of hundreds, perhaps
thousands,
of businesses to establish a baseline against which
future payment activity and behavior can be measured. The
Cash
Product
Office formally launched the study in 2006, with completion
slated for 2008.
Strengthening Customer and
Business Partnerships
The Federal Reserve’s cash business is a partnership
that includes external participants from both the private
and governmental sectors. Many of these
participants are directly affected by policy, process, and
currency design changes. At the same time, they are important
channels in the distribution of safe, reliable currency to
the public. Recognizing these important connections, the
Cash Product Office has made significant efforts over the
years to strengthen these relationships and to understand
participants’ needs as part of the decisionmaking process
for
cash services.
Depository institutions make up
one of the Federal Reserve’s
most critical constituencies. They represent the next link
in the network for distributing U.S. currency to the public.
To ensure timely and useful information flows with this
group, the Cash Product Office formed an advisory council
consisting
of 16 of the largest institutions by cash processing volume.
Virtually all of these institutions have a multistate presence.
Staff from the Product Office meet with members of this
group in person at least twice a year, with regular conference
calls scheduled between meetings. Their input has helped
shape a number of key policies and programs over the past
few years and will continue to provide invaluable input
for
future decisionmaking.
The armored carrier industry is another important constituency.
This group provides the critical link between the Federal
Reserve, depository institutions, and cash handling businesses.
The Product Office meets regularly with large national
carriers and the association representing local, independent
carriers.
The importance of this relationship becomes very apparent
when unanticipated events occur, such as Hurricane Katrina
in 2005. As the events surrounding Katrina unfolded,
established relationships combined with solid contingency
planning
enabled new transportation routes and processes, as well
as new partnerships,
to be put into place quickly to ensure the public had
access to currency.
Within the government sector, the Cash Product Office
is a member of the Advanced Counterfeit Deterrence
Committee. This committee consists of participants from the
Board
of Governors, the U.S. Treasury, the Bureau of Engraving
and
Printing, and the U.S. Secret Service. These entities
work
together to develop and coordinate anti-counterfeiting
strategies, including new currency designs, to preserve
public confidence in U.S. currency.
Looking Ahead
Will cash count in the future? With the steady growth
of U.S. currency and its broad acceptance supported
by public
confidence, it is likely cash will remain a vital component
of the payments system for the foreseeable future. Even
so, there’s little doubt that electronic payments
will continue to challenge how cash is used.
Assessing cash usage through initiatives such as the Cash
Payments Study will help the Federal Reserve paint a clearer
picture of the future. And looking ahead, one thing is
certain: cash will continue to count for the Federal Reserve.
The
Federal Reserve and the Cash Product Office will continue
to develop strategies, resources, and technologies to evolve
with the market. So, no matter what the future holds, the
Federal Reserve will work to ensure that U.S. currency
remains safe, reliable, and accessible.
Where Does All That Money Go?
At the end of 2006, slightly more than $783 billion of U.S currency was in circulation.
Interestingly, estimates indicate that well over half of this amount, perhaps
as much as two-thirds, is held outside U.S. borders. There are numerous reasons
why U.S. currency is held abroad. Individuals in foreign countries may want
to hold an internationally accepted currency as a hedge against inflation of
their local currency, or because of concerns about the local banking system
or political climate. More routine reasons include growing business and leisure
travel between the United States and other countries, as well as the transfer
of earnings from immigrant workers to their families in other countries. For
these reasons and many more, Federal Reserve notes can be found in most places
in the world.
Such a large stock of dollars held abroad has a number
of benefits, not the least of which is that currency
represents a claim on the United States that does not
require the payment of interest. If foreigners purchased U.S. Treasury securities
instead of holding U.S. currency, our government would pay interest totaling
billions of dollars per year. So, these foreign holdings of dollars can be
thought
of as an interest-free loan made to the United States. Of course, there are
some modest costs, relatively speaking, to print and
process the currency, but these
pale in comparison to the forgone interest. |
| |
Moving Money
The activation warning alarm
sounds. A brief moment of silence follows before the
automated storage and retrieval
machine launches. Like a small roller coaster, the
machine travels along a single 160-foot rail at speeds
up to seven miles per hour across the floor of the
cash vault to deposit and retrieve currency storage
containers filled with bundles of cash. Many Reserve
Banks have integrated automated processes, such as
the automated crane pictured here in the Los Angeles
Branch’s vault, to improve the capacity, safety,
and productivity for the storage and handling of the
vast amounts of cash that enter and leave the Federal
Reserve. In addition to automated cranes, some locations
use robotic vehicles to move containers. |
| |
What about Coins?
Reserve Banks distribute new coins
to the public through depository institutions when
they order cash. The Reserve Banks buy coins from the
U.S.
Mint at face value and account for them as an asset
on their balance sheets.
The Cash Product Office oversees the centralized
management of coin inventories and distribution within
the Federal
Reserve. In this role, it serves as the liaison with
the Mint. Each month, the Product Office sends a
coin order to the Mint, which plans its production
based
on this order and its own internal forecast. The
Product Office coordinates the distribution of new
coins to
the
Reserve Banks, monitors their coin inventories, and
redistributes inventories among offices to meet fluctuations
in regional
demand for coins.
In addition to coins stored in Reserve Bank vaults,
the Federal Reserve has agreements with 185 armored
carrier
locations to store, process, and distribute coins
on behalf of the Federal Reserve. The establishment
of
these coin terminals has improved the efficiency
of the coin
distribution process. Testing New Models
The demand for coin, as for currency,
varies seasonally and with economic activity. This
creates challenges
for managing coin inventory and production levels.
In late
2006, the Cash Product Office and the Mint completed
a proof-of-concept trial to determine if a new approach
for inventory management could effectively maintain
the right inventory levels by location when needed
to meet
fluctuating demand and reduce volatility in coin
production.
The trial focused on three strategies: (1) managing
coin
production and distribution at the market level;
(2) supplying new coins to the trial market at a constant
rate; and (3) allowing inventory levels at specific
sites to fluctuate in line with anticipated seasonal
needs.
In contrast, current practices generally focus on
managing
coin production and distribution for local offices,
which leads to more volatile inventory levels.
The Product Office will complete an evaluation of
the pilot program and develop recommendations for a
new coin
inventory management strategy in early 2007. Early
indications are that the new approach will reduce costs
and improve
efficiency. The Product Office would oversee the
implementation of the new strategy, if approved. |
|