Community Development Research Briefs
March 23, 2022
« Past issues
The Rapidly Growing Home Care Sector and Labor Force Participation
The COVID-19 pandemic has shed light on the growing need for home care workers, who support their elderly and disabled clients in their homes with activities of daily living, and on the challenges of recruiting and retaining workers in the industry. This brief describes the state of the home care sector and its connection to the economy. It looks at home care as a rapidly growing industry facing significant challenges and at home care’s role in enabling working-aged family members to participate in the labor force,i which supports the Federal Reserve’s maximum employment mandate.
There is an expanding need for home care in the United States, as the proportion of the population aged 65 and over rises.ii Home care is projected to add the largest number of jobs of any occupation over the next 10 years.iii At the same time, home care workers earn low wages and face challenging working conditions, factors that may be contributing to high turnover in the industryiv and a rising home care worker shortage.v
Although low wages pose challenges to home care worker recruitment and retention, long-term care is unaffordable for many families. Medicaid pays for the majority of home care costs in the United States; however, many states have Medicaid waitlists for long-term care, and Medicaid eligibility requires individuals to have limited assets or to spend down the countable assets they have.vi To fill the long-term care affordability gap, many family members—disproportionately women—provide unpaid care, often reducing work hours or dropping out of the labor force entirely.vii Studies estimating the economic impacts of increased public funding for home care find that such investments have economic implications, such as reductions in worker turnover and in reliance on social safety net programs, increases in tax revenues and consumer spending due to wage increases, and higher salaries of those who would otherwise reduce their work hours or drop out of the labor force to provide unpaid family care.viii
Improving home care worker wages, benefits, and working conditions and expanding access to subsidized home care has significant equity implications as well. The home care workforce is composed disproportionately of women of color and immigrant women.ix Unpaid family caregivers are also disproportionately women, many of whom reduce their own work hours or leave the labor force when they lack sufficient access to affordable, professional home care.x
In 2020, many states used pandemic subsidies to expand eligibility for Medicaid-funded home care services and to give home care workers retainer payments.xi However, with those subsidies expiring, industry researchers have noted that many home care agencies have reduced the worker recruitment and retention incentives they offered in 2020; thus, low wages persist, and worker turnover rates remain high.xii Improving pay, recruitment, and retention in this rapidly growing and disproportionately women of color workforce could not only support this sector, but also enable labor force participation and contribute to a more equitable economy.xiii
Professional Home Care Is a Growing and Challenged Sector
WHAT IS HOME CARE?
Professional home care work is one of the fastest-growing occupations in the country and includes a wide range of work activities that do not require a nursing degree to perform.xiv These tasks can include support with bathing, dressing, using the toilet, mobility, cooking and mealtimes, cleaning, medication reminders, basic wound care, companionship, and more. Home care work is also described in different states and agencies by multiple titles, such as home health aide, personal support worker, personal care worker, hospice home care worker, and more.xv
Home care work is highly variable, and workers often serve multiple clients with different needs. Home care workers may develop preferred work areas, such as in care needs related to hospice care, dementia, autism, or other areas with specific support needs. The intensity and duration of this care can be wide-ranging. Some clients may require around-the-clock support for months or years at a time, while others may need support for a few hours per day or week indefinitely or for different durations.
Clients and their families find this care through a wide variety of referral mechanisms, such as primary and specialist medical professionals, case managers, managed care organizations, medical discharge staff at hospitals, long-term care facilities, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, state home care commissions, public or private registries, and word of mouth. Depending on the state system, in addition to receiving care from unpaid family caregivers, clients and their families may employ professional home care workers directly or through a public state agency, a private home care agency, or a worker cooperative. Public programs, such as Medicaid or Medicare, may pay for some of a client’s home care costs, or clients and their families may pay out of pocket.
THE NEED FOR HOME CARE IS RISING
There are now over 56 million people aged 65 or older in the United States, including over 6.5 million who are older than 85, the latter of which is the nation’s fastest-growing age demographic.xvi This rapidly aging population has significant implications for home care. The population of older adults who will need care and the younger workforce who will provide that care is not projected to grow apace.xvii
Despite the home care worker shortage, both seniors and their adult children expect to increase their use of professional home care, particularly for household supports and mobility assistance.xviii The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) estimates that 70 percent of adults who are currently aged 65 and over will need long-term services and support at some point in their lives, for an average of three years, with a growing number needing support for five years or longer.xix Ninety percent of those aged 65 or older in the United States want to age in place in their own homes and communities.xx
Many experts consider aging in place with home care support to be the ideal form of long-term care. It enables elderly individuals to remain in familiar and comfortable settings in their homes while their physical and cognitive abilities decline with age.xxi Aging in place is associated with several medical and emotional benefits because it enables individuals to maintain social ties and autonomy.xxii
Home care fills a specific and rapidly growing niche in the long-term care continuum for elderly and disabled individuals who desire to stay in their homes. For many, the COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increased awareness of home care as an alternative to long-term care facilities, which have been particularly vulnerable to outbreaks of the virus.xxiii Aging in place with professional home care support is also less expensive than nursing home care.xxiv In addition to supporting elderly individuals to age in place, personal support aides provide home care to disabled individuals of all ages so that they can maintain autonomy and independence in their own homes.
THE HOME CARE WORKFORCE IS GROWING RAPIDLY
Due to our aging population and the support needs of disabled individuals, the need for home care workers is growing rapidly. In the past decade, the home care workforce nearly doubled in size to over 3.2 million workers.xxv Among health care workers, home care workers are the largest occupation, and they receive the lowest wages.xxvi Home care is also one of the fastest-growing occupations across all industries. The Bureau of Labor Statistics predicts that home care will add more than 1.1 million new jobs by 2029, exceeding the numbers of new jobs projected to be added in any other occupation.xxvii However, the demand for home care workers still far exceeds the supply; over half of home care employers report that they are serving more clients than they did in the previous year, while struggling to recruit and retain skilled workers.xxviii
WHO ARE HOME CARE WORKERS?
Professional home care workers are disproportionately women of color. Nationally, 88 percent are women, 44 percent are people of color, 38 percent are women of color, and 26 percent are foreign-born. For comparison, the U.S. working population is 14 percent women of color and 17 percent foreign-born. The median age of professional home care workers is 50 years old. 85 percent have at least a high school diploma, including 12 percent who have an associate degree.xxix
HOME CARE WORKERS RECEIVE LOW WAGES AND FACE RACIAL DISPARITIES
Home care workers earn the lowest wages of any health care occupation, with a median wage of $12.15/hour and a median annual income of $25,280 in 2019. This increased to $13.02/hour and $27,080 annually in 2020,xxx though those increases may prove temporary as they were largely due to pandemic Medicaid subsidies.xxxi Because of their unique employment situation and low median wages, many home care workers struggle to access affordable, quality health insurance. Fifteen percent of home care workers do not have health insurance. Of those who do, 35 percent are covered under Medicaid.xxxii
Within the home care workforce, stark racial disparities are evident in workers’ finances. Black and Hispanicxxxiii home care workers tend to face higher rates of poverty than their white counterparts. Twenty-five percent of Black home care workers and 23 percent of Hispanic home care workers are below the poverty line, compared with 16 percent of white home care workers. Black and Hispanic home care workers also rely more heavily on social safety net programs that provide food assistance and health insurance coverage. Thirty-six percent of Black workers and 37 percent of Hispanic workers receive food stamps, compared with 21 percent of white workers. Thirty-five percent of Black workers and 45 percent of Hispanic workers receive health coverage through Medicaid, compared with 23 percent of white workers.xxxiv
Scholars have noted that the low wages and racial disparities that home care workers face are not coincidental, but rather result from historical and contemporary racialized occupational segregation.xxxv As domestic workers, home care workers were excluded from basic labor protections, including minimum wage and overtime, under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) of 1938. At that time, the majority of domestic workers were Black women, and scholars have documented that these exclusions were based in anti-Black racism.xxxvi Seventy-seven years later, in 2015, a Department of Labor rule change went into effect that expanded FLSA to include domestic workers who do not primarily perform companionship services.xxxvii This means that most home care workers are now subject to the federal minimum wage and overtime standards.xxxviii However, several states also maintain companionship exemptions. So, in cases where the state minimum wage is higher or the state overtime standards are stronger than they are at the federal level, this can leave home care workers earning the lower federal minimum wage or subject only to weaker federal overtime standards.xxxix
HIGH HOME CARE WORKER TURNOVER HAS HIGH COSTS
Low wages and challenging working conditions contribute to high rates of home care worker turnover. Home care worker turnover averages 65 percent over the course of a year,xl but many workers leave earlier. Thirty-seven percent of home care workers leave their position within 90 days, including 21 percent who leave in the first 30 days on the job.xli These high turnover rates exacerbate the industry’s labor shortage, and the majority of employers in the field cite turnover and worker shortages as their most significant challenges.xlii
These worker shortages limit business growth and the ability to provide care for those who need it. Seventy-four percent of home care providers report having to turn away clients referred to their agencies due to worker shortages. On the other hand, the majority (52 percent) of home care providers agree that increasing compensation and benefits is key to improving recruitment and retention.xliii Replacing a low-wage worker, such as a home care worker, is estimated to cost 16 percent of the worker’s annual wages.xliv Therefore, improving worker retention holds potential to reduce employer costs from turnover even while increasing wages.
In addition to low wages, home care workers face several on-the-job hazards that contribute to burnout and turnover. Home care is a physically demanding occupation, and home care workplace injury rates are higher than the national average.xlv Working in individual clients’ homes can be isolating, leading to challenges in moving clients without help and to potentially dangerous situations when clients or other people in the home become violent.xlvi Fifty percent of home care workers report experiencing verbal abuse on the job, 27 percent have experienced workplace aggression, 24 percent have experienced workplace violence, 26 percent have faced sexual harassment, and 13 percent have had to contend with sexual aggression. These hazardous working conditions contribute to high turnover, as experiencing any of these forms of workplace abuse is associated with heightened stress, depression, sleep problems, and burnout for home care workers.xlvii
Unpaid Family Caregiving Reduces Labor Force Participation
In addition to professional home care workers, who may include family members paid by public home care funding in states where this is permissible, about 53 million people in the United States provide unpaid home care for elderly and disabled family members or friends and neighbors.xlviii This includes large numbers who are in their prime wage-earning years. The median age of unpaid family caregivers is 51 years old. Eighty-two percent of these unpaid family caregiversxlix are under age 65, while 46 percent are under age 50.l The majority (61 percent) of family caregivers are women. Unlike professional, paid home care workers, who are disproportionately women of color and immigrants, family caregiver racial and ethnic demographics roughly reflect those of the general population.li
A national study conducted by the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) found that the majority (89 percent) of unpaid family caregivers provide care to a family member. This figure includes 50 percent who care for a parent or parent-in-law, 12 percent who care for a spouse or partner, 8 percent who care for a grandparent or grandparent-in-law, and 6 percent who care for an adult child, while about 10 percent care for a friend or neighbor.lii Forty percent of family caregivers provide care to someone in their same household, but this varies by race and ethnicity. Family caregivers of color are more likely than white caregivers to live in the same household as the person they care for, with 51 percent of Asian American caregivers, 48 percent of Hispanic caregivers, and 45 percent of Black caregivers living in the same household, compared with 36 percent of white caregivers.liii
Additionally, large numbers of family caregivers provide care to multiple people (24 percent).liv While the majority of family caregivers provide care for adults only, 9 million people in the United States are the primary caregivers for both adults and children with medical or behavioral conditions or disabilities.lv This figure includes members of the “sandwich generation,” who care for elderly parents while also raising children.lvi These multiple caregiving responsibilities place compounded physical, emotional, and financial strains on individuals and families as they navigate employment and health care decisions. Further, the COVID-19 pandemic has placed additional pressures on home care workers and unpaid family caregivers. Family caregivers have taken on an average of nine additional unpaid caregiving hours per week to care for elderly and disabled loved ones during the pandemic.lvii
UNPAID CAREGIVING COMES WITH DIRECT COSTS AND OPPORTUNITY COSTS
Care is expensive, whether in institutional settings, by professional home care workers, or by unpaid family caregivers. On average, unpaid family caregivers provide 24 hours per week of unpaid labor. Seventy-eight percent of unpaid family caregivers cover an average of $7,242 out of pocket each year in direct expenses, such as covering their family members’ rental or mortgage payments, home accessibility modifications, or medical expenses.lviii These unpaid family caregivers make financial sacrifices to provide unpaid care, with 45 percent experiencing at least one financial impact. To pay for their loved ones’ care needs, 28 percent have stopped saving, 23 percent have taken on debt, 19 percent report not being able to pay bills on time, about 17 percent reduce their own retirement contributions, 10 percent withdraw retirement savings, 30 percent use personal savings, 14 percent reduce their own health care expenses, and 11 percent report being unable to afford food and other basic expenses.lix
In addition to these direct costs, unpaid family caregiving incurs indirect costs in terms of reduced labor force participation. Sixty-one percent of unpaid family caregivers report experiencing at least one impact on their employment due to caregiving responsibilities. This can lead to underemployment, as 15 percent of unpaid family caregivers reduced their hours from full- to part-time employment.lx Overall, more than half of unpaid family caregivers report needing to take time off from work, reduce their work hours, or leave the labor force altogether to fulfill their caregiving responsibilities.lxi
When valued at a replacement wage, one estimate suggests that the average value of unpaid family caregiving is estimated to be at least $111,000 per family over the average period of long-term carelxii and $470 billion in total.lxiii However, this calculation of the value of unpaid family caregiving labor is a calculation just of the value of the unpaid caregiving provided. This calculation does not take into account the net loss to the economy of unpaid family caregivers who incur costs to provide that care, including reduced income by decreasing their work hours or leaving the labor force entirely. Such employment disruptions can have lasting impacts on promotion opportunities, benefits eligibility, lifetime earnings, and retirement savings.lxiv One study found that family caregivers who leave the labor force early to care for a loved one lose an average of $392,924 in wages, social security, and pension benefits. Cumulatively, this represents a loss of about $3.9 trillion from unpaid family caregivers leaving the labor force over their lifetimes.lxv
Because the majority of unpaid family caregivers are women, these financial impacts have gender equity implications as well. Compared with women, men who are unpaid family caregivers are more likely to be salaried employees.lxvi Notably, Black women are the demographic most likely to juggle both unpaid caregiving and hourly wage work.lxvii Overall, women caregivers drop out of the labor force three times as often as men due to unpaid caregiving responsibilities, and 20 percent of all unpaid family caregivers leave the labor force entirely.lxviii Almost half of unpaid family caregivers who stopped working report that they had to stop paid employment because they needed more time to provide care.lxix Additionally, others cited employment barriers that prevented them from continuing to work while caregiving, including lack of flexible hours and paid time off.lxx
In contrast, workplace leave benefits, where unpaid family caregivers are able to take paid time off from work to provide necessary care, are associated with unpaid family caregivers’ being able to continue working.lxxi In addition to workplace leave policies, investments in professional home care can also help unpaid family caregivers participate in the labor force. A Harvard study of the impacts of state-level Medicaid policy that increased use of professional home care workers by 50 percent found that this increase resulted in professional home care workers replacing family caregivers. This expansion of Medicaid-funded home care allowed family members—particularly women—to participate in the labor force.lxxii
Specifically, among women caring for parents, for every 2.4 to 3 women whose parents received professional home care due to this policy, an additional woman was able to work full-time.lxxiii Such support for professional home care has the potential to help a large number of family caregivers participate in the labor force, because currently only 36% of unpaid family caregivers have any form of professional, paid caregiving support.lxxiv Although expanded Medicaid has allowed more women who care for parents to participate in the labor force, the benefit is limited to those eligible for Medicaid. Nevertheless, making home care accessible and affordable to more families may have significant implications for equitable economic growth.
Supporting unpaid family caregivers to participate in the labor force also could result in significant economic gains.lxxv An AARP study with family caregivers who are 50 years old or older estimates that supporting them to participate in the workforce could lead to additional GDP growth of 5.5 percent in 2030 and 6.5 percent in 2050.lxxvi As 46 percent of family caregivers are under age 50, supporting all family caregivers to participate in the labor force has the potential to deliver even greater gains to the economy.
Home Care Is an Expanding but Fragmented Industry
The U.S. home care market is growing rapidly, with revenue rising from $78.5 billion in 2011 to $109.6 billion in 2021.lxxvii It is a fragmented market in terms of number and types of providers, employment relationships, funding sources, referral mechanisms, and varying state regulations. In addition to home care workers who are employed directly by clients without a third-party public or private agency joint employer, there are 429,045 registered home care businesses. No single entity has more than a 5 percent market share.lxxviii The majority of registered establishments are small businesses, with 77 percent employing fewer than 50 workers, including 63 percent that have fewer than 20 employees.lxxix
Because these small businesses may struggle to access capital, some community development financial institutions (CDFIs) are stepping in to fill this financing gap. On the other end of the spectrum, as the industry and the need for home care grows, hospitals and large health care corporations are increasingly considering adding hospice home care and other home care services to their business models. Home care worker associations have also created worker cooperatives and nonprofit partnerships to administer referral networks in an effort to set industry standards and help clients find home care workers. Depending on the state and funding sources used to pay for home care, clients then employ these workers either directly or jointly with a public agency or private company.
HOME CARE COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCES
Since home care allows individuals to stay in their homes, it is a less expensive long-term care option than nursing home care.lxxx Still, home care is unaffordable for many, costing $4,576 per month or $54,912 per year, on average, nationally.lxxxi Long-term care costs are expected to continue to increase across the board, with home care costs projected to increase to $6,150 per month or $73,797 per year, on average, by 2030.lxxxii
Public funding covers about 71 percent of all home health care nationally.lxxxiii This figure includes a small amount of home care for more acute, shorter-term cases, such as hospice care, which is more likely to be covered by Medicare and private health insurance. It also includes the larger portion of publicly funded home care support with activities of daily living, which is covered by Medicaid and paid for out of pocket. State, local, and smaller federal sources of home care funding, such as funding from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, cover some home care costs as well.
States determine how these public funds for home care can be spent. Publicly funded home care varies by state and can include contracts with private agencies or consumer-directed home care selection that is reimbursed by state agencies for eligible clients. In many consumer-directed state programs, the majority of home care workers are family members of their clients. This allows family caregivers to participate in the labor force, though their wages and earning potential are limited.lxxxiv
However, public funds for home care are limited. This means that not every elderly or disabled client receives all the home care hours they need, or any hours at all. In 2018, there were about 820,000 adults on state Medicaid waitlists for home care.lxxxv Even in states without Medicaid waitlists, many families struggle to access sufficient affordable care. To qualify for Medicaid, individuals must spend down countable financial assets first, based on state limits.lxxxvi This requirement may leave many in financial limbo—unable to adequately pay for care out of pocket and unable to qualify for publicly funded care.
Nationally, private long-term care insurance does not adequately fill this gap, as it is expensive and relatively uncommon, comprising only about 10 percent of industry revenue.lxxxvii The long-term care insurance industry also has contracted significantly in recent decades,lxxxviii with the numbers insured decreasing while premiums rise and benefits stagnate.lxxxix In practice, individuals and their families may combine publicly funded home care with additional hours paid for out of pocket through private home care agencies or directly to individuals, and fill in gaps with unpaid family caregiving.xc
Implications for Policy and Practice
Home care is essential for the U.S. economy and for the autonomy of disabled individuals and the rapidly growing older population. Professional home care enables unpaid family caregivers, who are disproportionately working-aged women, to participate in the labor force at their regular hours and salary levels.xci However, numerous challenges in this industry remain. Home care is unaffordable for many families, and Medicaid subsidies may be difficult to access with specific eligibility requirementsxcii and state waitlists.xciii
Low wages and challenging working conditions also pose obstacles for home care worker recruitment and retention,xciv with turnover at 65 percent annually.xcv Increasing wages and benefits holds potential for reducing worker turnover, and jurisdictions that have done so have seen significant declines in turnover.xcvi Some studies also estimate that increasing home care worker wages could result in overall gains to the economy and public savings,xcvii as home care workers would be less reliant on public safety-net programs.xcviii
In addition to wage increases, expanded access to benefits—either publicly provided or employer provided—is associated with reduced home care worker turnover.xcix Professional development opportunities for home care workers that are tied to wage increases and improved competencies in specialization areas can lead to greater worker satisfaction, with implications for worker retention.c Some jurisdictions have created shared services models to deliver such benefits, as well as worker training.ci Because the home care industry has varied and unique employment structures, shared services models may facilitate providing benefits and career ladders to workers who otherwise might struggle to access workplace benefits or increased wages and training. To support these efforts and the small businesses that make up the majority of registered home care firms in their efforts to increase worker recruitment and retention, CDFIs may consider how best to support agencies with access to smaller capital loans. CDFIs are particularly well positioned to consider the needs of such small businesses that are operated by and serve low- and moderate-income people of color.
Additionally, access to paid-leave benefits has a significant effect on labor force participation of unpaid family caregivers, who are more likely to remain employed if they can take paid leave to care for loved ones.cii Expanded funding for home care through public trust worker payroll tax models,ciii employer-provided long-term care insurance, or expanded eligibility for Medicaid could be explored to support unpaid family caregivers’ labor force participation.civ Multiple stakeholders across sectors have an opportunity to support labor force participation and equitable economic growth by engaging with this rapidly growing sector.
View home care snapshot fact sheets by state within the 12th Federal Reserve District.
The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco or the Federal Reserve System.
Thanks to Bina Patel Shrimali, Kelly Kramer, and Kevin Ortiz for editorial guidance.
i. Shen, Karen. May 12, 2021. “Who Benefits from Public Financing for Low-Income Seniors?” Harvard University Department of Business Economics Job Market Paper.
ii. America Counts Staff. December 10, 2019. “By 2030, All Baby Boomers Will Be Age 65 or Older.” U.S. Census Bureau.
iii. Bureau of Labor Statistics. April 9, 2021. “Fastest Growing Occupations, 2019 and Projected 2029.” Employment Projections Program.
iv. Holly, Robert. May 19, 2021. “‘A Huge Victory’: Home Care Turnover Remains Stable at 65.2%.” Home Health Care News.
v. Kujawa, Megan. 2021. “How to Get Creative with Recruitment When Caregiver Applications Are Down.” Kujawa, Megan. 2021. Home Care Pulse, citing Home Care Pulse “2021 Annual Home Care Benchmarking Study.”
vi. American Council on Aging. January 6, 2021. “Spending Down Assets to Become Eligible for Nursing Home/Long-Term Care.”
vii. Specifically, daughters of elderly parents who need home care disproportionately benefit from expanded access to home care. Shen, Karen. May 12, 2021. “Who Benefits from Public Financing for Low-Income Seniors?” Harvard University Department of Business Economics Job Market Paper. AARP. May 2020. “Caregiving in the U.S.: Family Caregiving.”
viii. Palladino, Lenore, and Chirag Lala. June 2021. “The Economic Effects of Investing in Quality Care Jobs and Paid Family and Medical Leave.” Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts Amherst; Jaboula-Carolus, Isaac, Stephanie Luce, and Ruth Milkman. 2021. “The Case for Public Investment in Higher Pay for New York State Home Care Workers: Estimated Costs and Savings.” City University of New York (CUNY) Graduate Center.
ix. U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey: 2015–2019 (Five-Year Estimate).
x. AARP, May 2020. “Caregiving in the U.S.: Family Caregiving.”
xi. Musumeci, Mary-Beth, Rachel Dolan, and Madeline Guth. August 26, 2020. “State Actions to Sustain Medicaid Long-Term Services and Supports During COVID-19.” Kaiser Family Foundation.
xii. Home Care Pulse. August 2021. “Top 10 Reasons Your Caregivers Are Leaving.”
xiii. Buckman, Shelby R., Laura Y. Choi, Mary C. Daly, and Lily M. Seitelman. 2021. “The Economic Gains from Equity.” Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper 2021-11.
xiv. Although many home care workers may have professional certifications and degrees, home care work as discussed in this report generally does not require a nursing degree. This distinguishes home care occupations—where workers may assist clients with activities of daily living—from home health nursing occupations. For example, while home care workers may provide reminders for client-administered medications or do basic wound care, home health nurses may administer medications and carry out more advanced medical treatments in their clients’ homes.
xv. Many states have further distinctions in training and duties for different types of home care work, including home health specialties, which may require additional hours of training beyond those required for basic home care duties. Personal care aides or personal support workers generally specialize in working with disabled individuals and may receive specialized training, depending on the state.
xvi. Ortman, Jennifer M., Victoria A. Velkoff, and Howard Hogan. 2014. “An Aging Nation: The Older Population in the United States, Current Population Reports.” Pp. 25–1140. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.
xvii. U.S. Census Bureau. “Projected Five-Year Age Groups and Sex Composition of the Population Projections for the United States: 2017–2060.”
xviii. Brown, Melissa. May 26, 2021. “New Senior Care Survey Reveals Lasting Impacts of the Pandemic on Older Adults and Family Caregivers.” Care.com
xix. Department of Health and Human Services Administration on Aging. February 18, 2020. “How Much Care Will You Need?”
xx. Arigoni, Danielle. May 2018 [Updated January 2020]. “Preparing for an Aging Population.” AARP.
xxi. Iecovich, Esther. 2014. “Aging in Place: From Theory to Practice.” Anthropological Notebooks 20 (1): 21—33.
xxii. Cutchin, Malcolm P. 2003. “The Process of Mediated Aging-In-Place: A Theoretically and Empirically Based Model.” Journal of Social Sciences & Medicine 57: 1077–90.
xxiii. Brown, Melissa. May 26, 2021. “New Senior Care Survey Reveals Lasting Impacts of the Pandemic on Older Adults and Family Caregivers.” Care.com.
xxiv. Chappell, Neena L., Betty Havens Dlitt, Marcus J. Hollander, Jo Ann Miller, and Carol McWilliam. 2004. “Comparative Costs of Home Care and Residential Care.” The Gerontologist 44 (3): 389–400; Kaye, H. Stephen, Mitchell P. LaPlante, and Charlene Harrington. 2009. “Do Noninstitutional Long-Term Care Services Reduce Medicaid Spending?” Health Affairs 28 (1): 262–72.
xxv. Bureau of Labor Statistics. March 31, 2021. “Occupational Employment and Wages Data, 1988 to May 2020.”
xxvi. Bureau of Labor Statistics. March 31, 2021. “Occupational Employment and Wages Summary.” News Release.
xxvii. Bureau of Labor Statistics. April 9, 2021. “Fastest Growing Occupations, 2019 and Projected 2029.” Employment Projections Program.
xxviii. Genworth. November 2020. “Drivers of the Cost of Care.”
xxix. U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey: 2015–2019 (Five-Year Estimate). IPUMS Microdata.
xxx. Bureau of Labor Statistics. May 2019 and 2020. “Occupational Employment and Wages Statistics.” National OEWS.
xxxi. Musumeci, Mary-Beth, Rachel Dolan, and Madeline Guth. August 26, 2020. “State Actions to Sustain Medicaid Long-Term Services and Supports During COVID-19.” Kaiser Family Foundation.
xxxii. U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey: 2015–2019 (Five-Year Estimate). IPUMS Microdata.
xxxiii. Recognizing the complexity of evolving terminology to describe race/ethnicity, we use Hispanic in keeping with the survey cited, but we would like to acknowledge that this ethnic group includes multiple racial identities and many people in this ethnic group prefer alternate terminology to identify themselves.
xxxiv. U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey: 2015–2019 (Five-Year Estimate). IPUMS Microdata.
xxxv. Parreñas, Rhacel Salazar. 2000. “Migrant Filipina Domestic Workers and the International Division of Reproductive Labor.” Gender & Society 14 (4): 560–80; Perea, Juan F. 2011. “The Echoes of Slavery: Recognizing the Racist Origins of the Agricultural and Domestic Worker Exclusion from the National Labor Relations Act.” Ohio State Law Journal 72: 95–138.
xxxvi. Perea, Juan F. 2011. “The Echoes of Slavery: Recognizing the Racist Origins of the Agricultural and Domestic Worker Exclusion from the National Labor Relations Act.” Ohio State Law Journal 72: 95–138.
xxxvii. Government Accountability Office. October 2020. “Fair Labor Standards Act: Observations on the Effect of the Home Care Rule.”
xxxix. National Employment Law Project. 2016. “Home Care Worker Rights in the States After the Federal Companionship Rules Change.”
xl. This figure is down from an all-time high turnover rate of 82 percent in 2018. Holly, Robert. May 19, 2021. “‘A Huge Victory’: Home Care Turnover Remains Stable at 65.2%.” Home Health Care News.
xli. Home Care Pulse. August 2021. “Top 10 Reasons Your Caregivers Are Leaving.”
xlii. Home Care Pulse. 2021. “The Home Care Benchmarking Study.”
xliii. Home Health Care News. “Home Health and Home Care Staffing Survey Results 2021.”
xliv. Boushey, Heather, and Sarah Jane Glynn. 2012. “There Are Significant Business Costs to Replacing Employees.” Center for American Progress.
xlv. Campbell, Stephen. April 2018. “Workplace Injuries and the Direct Care Workforce.” PHI Issue Brief.
xlvi. Wharton, Tracy, and Bryan Ford. 2014. “What Is Known About Dementia Care Recipient Violence and Aggression Against Caregivers?” Journal of Gerontological Social Work 57 (7): 460–77.
xlvii. Hanson, Ginger C., Nancy A. Perrin, Helen Moss, Naima Laharnar, and Nancy Glass. 2015. “Workplace Violence Against Homecare Workers and Its Relationship with Workers’ Health Outcomes: A Cross-Sectional Study.” BMC Public Health 15 (11).
xlviii. This figure includes 42 million unpaid family caregivers who provide elder care to someone aged 50 or older. AARP. May 2020. “Caregiving in the U.S.: Family Caregiving.”
xlix. Family caregiving is often also reciprocal in nature. The literature refers to these unpaid caregivers as family caregivers, though they include both relatives and friends and neighbors who are not always related to those for whom they provide care. Reinhard, Susan C., Lynn Friss Feinberg, Ari Houser, Rita Choula, and Molly Evans. November 2019. “Valuing the Invaluable: 2019 Update.” AARP Public Policy Institute.
l. AARP. May 2020. “Caregiving in the U.S.: Family Caregiving.”
lvi. Bureau of Labor Statistics. “Number and Percent of Eldercare Providers Who Were Parents of Household Children Under Age 18 by Sex and Selected Characteristics, Averages for the Combined Years 2017–2018.”
lvii. Genworth. 2020. “Caregiving in COVID-19: Consumer Sentiment Survey.”
lviii. AARP. June 2021. “Caregiving Out-Of-Pocket Costs Study.”
lix. AARP. May 2020. “Caregiving in the U.S.: Family Caregiving.”
lxii. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. January 2021. “Long-Term Services and Supports for Older Americans: Risks and Financing, 2020.”
lxiii. Reinhard, Susan C., Lynn Friss Feinberg, Ari Houser, Rita Choula, and Molly Evans. November 2019. “Valuing the Invaluable: 2019 Update.” AARP Public Policy Institute.
lxiv. AARP. May 2020. “Caregiving in the U.S.: Family Caregiving.”
lxv. Inflation-adjusted figure from 2008 dollars cited in: “The MetLife Study of Caregiving Costs to Working Caregivers: Double Jeopardy for Baby Boomers Caring for Their Parents.” MetLife Mature Market Institute, National Alliance for Caregiving, Center for Long-Term Care Research at New York Medical College, June 2011.
lxvi. AARP. May 2020. “Caregiving in the U.S.: Family Caregiving.”
lxvii. Feinberg, Lynn Friss, and Laura Skufca. December 2020. “Managing a Paid Job and Family Caregiving Is a Growing Reality.” Washington, DC: AARP.
lxviii. AARP. 2021. “The Economic Impact of Supporting Working Family Caregivers.”
lxix. AARP. May 2020. “Caregiving in the U.S.: Family Caregiving.”
lxxii. Shen, Karen. May 12, 2021. “Who Benefits from Public Financing for Low-Income Seniors?” Harvard University Department of Business Economics Job Market Paper.
lxxiv. AARP. May 2020. “Caregiving in the U.S.: Family Caregiving.”
lxxv. Reinhard, Susan C., Lynn Friss Feinberg, Ari Houser, Rita Choula, and Molly Evans. November 2019. “Valuing the Invaluable: 2019 Update.” AARP Public Policy Institute.
lxxvi. AARP. 2021. “The Economic Impact of Supporting Working Family Caregivers.”
lxxvii. IBISWorld. August 16, 2021. “Home Care Providers in the US: Market Size 2002–2027.”
lxxviii. IBISWorld. August 16, 2021. “Home Care Providers in the U.S.: Number of Businesses 2002–2027.”
lxxix. U.S. Census Bureau Economic Census. “Health Care and Social Assistance Series Employment Size by Firms in the U.S.: 2017.”
lxxx. Dorman Marek, Karen, Frank Stetzer, Scott J. Adams, Lori L. Popejoy, and Marilyn Rantz. 2011. “Aging in Place Versus Nursing Home Care: Comparison of Costs to Medicare and Medicaid.” Research in Gerontological Nursing 5 (2). Scott J. Adams, Lori L. Popejoy, and Marilyn Rantz. 2011. “Aging in Place Versus Nursing Home Care: Comparison of Costs to Medicare and Medicaid.” Research in Gerontological Nursing 5 (2).
lxxxi. Genworth. August 2020. “Cost of Care Survey.” Note: This estimate is for 44 hours/week, though the number of hours individuals receive can be highly variable. For comparison, nursing homes charge, on average, $93,075 annually for a semi-private room and $150,850 for a private room.
lxxxii. Genworth. August 2020. “Cost of Care Survey.” Inflation-adjusted.
lxxxiii. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 2019. “National Health Expenditures Accounts.”
lxxxiv. Thomason, Sarah, Lea J.E. Austin, Annette Bernhardt, Laura Dresser, Ken Jacobs, and Marcy Whitebook. May 2018. “At the Wage Floor: Covering Homecare and Early Education Workers in the New Generation of Minimum Wage Laws.” Center for Labor Research and Education, UC Berkeley.
lxxxv. Kaiser Family Foundation Medicaid HCBS Surveys. FY 2018. “Waiting List for Enrollment for Medicaid Section 1915(c) Home and Community-Based Waivers.”
lxxxvi. American Council on Aging. January 6, 2021. “Spending Down Assets to Become Eligible for Nursing Home/Long-Term Care.”
lxxxvii. Diment, Dmitry. August 2021. “Home Care Providers in the US: Industry Performance.” IBISWorld.
lxxxviii. National Association of Insurance Commissioners. May 2016. “The State of Long-Term Care Insurance: The Market, Challenges, and Future Innovations.”
lxxxix. LifePlans. 2017. “Who Buys Long-Term Care Insurance? Twenty-Five Years of Study of Buyers and Non-Buyers in 2015–2016.”
xc. Reinhard, Susan C., Lynn Friss Feinberg, Ari Houser, Rita Choula, and Molly Evans. November 2019. “Valuing the Invaluable: 2019 Update.” AARP Public Policy Institute.
xci. Shen, Karen. May 12, 2021. “Who Benefits from Public Financing for Low-Income Seniors?” Harvard University Department of Business Economics Job Market Paper.
xcii. American Council on Aging. January 6, 2021. “Spending Down Assets to Become Eligible for Nursing Home/Long-Term Care.”
xciii. Kaiser Family Foundation Medicaid HCBS Surveys. FY 2018. “Waiting List for Enrollment for Medicaid Section 1915(c) Home and Community-Based Waivers.”
xciv. Home Care Pulse. 2021. “The Home Care Benchmarking Study.”
xcv. Holly, Robert. May 19, 2021. “‘A Huge Victory’: Home Care Turnover Remains Stable at 65.2%.” Home Health News.
xcvi.For example, in San Francisco, union home care workers who negotiated wage and benefit increases reduced turnover from 74 percent to 39 percent. Howes, Candace. 2005. “Living Wages and Retention of Homecare Workers.” Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 44 (1): 139–63. See also: Houseworth, James, Sandra L. Pettingell, Julie E. Kramme, Renata Tich´, and Amy S. Hewitt. 2020. “Predictors of Annual and Early Separations Among Direct Support Professionals: National Core Indicators Staff Stability Survey.” Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 58 (3): 192–207.
xcvii. One study estimated that raising home care worker wages to $15/hour could result in a net gain for the economy of $40.67 billion per year. Such a wage increase could create 741,457 new jobs in the home care workforce, as well as an additional 394,611 jobs in the broader economy due to the workers’ increased spending powers. Palladino, Lenore, and Chirag Lala. June 2021. “The Economic Effects of Investing in Quality Care Jobs and Paid Family and Medical Leave.” Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
xcviii. A study of projected impacts of raising home care worker wages in New York State finds that the projected economic benefits through economic spillover effects, new income and sales tax revenues, reduced public assistance use by home care workers, and gains from increased productivity and reduced turnover are almost double the projected costs from increased wages, benefits, and payroll taxes. The New York study estimates that an investment of $3.96 billion in raising home care worker wages would result in an economic benefit of $7.6 billion and a net gain of $3.7 billion to the state economy, with even larger estimated gains from a larger investment in higher wages. Jaboula-Carolus, Isaac, Stephanie Luce, and Ruth Milkman. 2021. “The Case for Public Investment in Higher Pay for New York State Home Care Workers: Estimated Costs and Savings.” City University of New York (CUNY) Graduate Center.
xcix. For example, although 11 percent of home care workers who do not have paid sick days or unpaid family leave benefits left their jobs, only 6 percent of those who had access to those benefits did. AARP. May 2020. “Caregiving in the U.S.: Family Caregiving.”
c. Sterling, Madeline R., Jacklyn Cho, Joanna Bryan Ringel, and Ariel C. Avgar. 2020. “Heart Failure Training and Job Satisfaction: A Survey of Home Care Workers Caring for Adults with Heart Failure in New York City.” Ethnicity & Disease 30 (4): 575–82. Note also that training requirements are federally regulated only for Medicare-funded home care, such as hospice home care. Home health aides who provide this Medicare-funded home care may command higher wages than home care workers without this training. Further training requirements may be specified at the state level.
ci. For example, Oregon and Washington have shared-services models for administering training and benefits, and shared-services models are in place in multiple jurisdictions for child care (see, for example: Shared Services as a Strategy to Support Child Care).
cii. AARP. May 2020. “Caregiving in the U.S.: Family Caregiving.”
ciii. In 2019, Washington State passed the first state-level social insurance program for long-term care. Workers contribute $0.58 per every $100 earned to a trust for a specified number of years. Those who are eligible receive a benefit of up to $36,500 toward the costs of long-term care, including home care. This is just one possible model for addressing the home care affordability gap, especially for families who do not qualify for Medicaid but struggle to afford to pay out of pocket for home care. Washington State Department of Social and Health Services. “Long-Term Services and Supports Trust Act.”
civ. Shen, Karen. May 12, 2021. “Who Benefits from Public Financing for Low-Income Seniors?” Harvard University Department of Business Economics Job Market Paper.
Download PDF (pdf, 423.1 kb)
Article CitationStepick, Lina and Brooke Tran. 2022. "The Rapidly Growing Home Care Sector and Labor Force Participation." Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Community Development Research Brief 2022-2. doi: 10.24148/cdrb2022-02